[Bug 1750625] Re: update misinterprets 304 response on Packages.gz

2018-02-20 Thread robocoder
** Attachment added: "Minimal /dists folder for testing" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1750625/+attachment/5059382/+files/freight.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1750625] Re: update misinterprets 304 response on Packages.gz

2018-02-20 Thread robocoder
In trusty, this works as expected. ii apt 1.0.1ubuntu2.1 amd64commandline package manager ii apt-transport-https 1.0.1ubuntu2.1 amd64https download

[Bug 1750625] Re: update misinterprets 304 response on Packages.gz

2018-02-20 Thread robocoder
Still occurring in xenial with apt 1.2.25 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1750625 Title: update misinterprets 304 response on Packages.gz To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1750625] [NEW] update misinterprets 304 response on Packages.gz

2018-02-20 Thread robocoder
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS Release:16.04 ii apt 1.2.24 amd64commandline package manager ii apt-transport-https 1.2.24 amd64

[Bug 1011339] Re: unable to connect to an afp server

2012-06-29 Thread robocoder
is this a 64-bit issue? as in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538699 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #538699 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538699 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 197267] Re: getting ACPI Invalid PBLK Length 5 - message on Hardy Alpha 5

2008-12-20 Thread robocoder
Google search suggests that it's predominantly users with Asus motherboards/systems who see this message. (But not all Asus motherboards/systems are problematic.) I'm seeing this error with an older Asus A7A266 running Intrepid (2.6.27-9). -- getting ACPI Invalid PBLK Length 5 - message on

[Bug 230170] [NEW] hardy: no sound (emu10k1) in 2.6.24-17-generic

2008-05-13 Thread robocoder
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-386 I believe I picked up 2.6.24-17-generic as a recommended update. And it appears the linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-17-386 package was not built and thus, not available as an update. Workaround: roll back to 2.6.24-16-386. ** Affects: linux-meta