[Bug 1343656] Re: Unable to install crossbuild-essential-powerpc on x86_64 (amd64)

2014-07-17 Thread semi-newbie
Okay, it didn't let me make that change, instead informing me that build-essential is the source package for crossbuild-essential-powerpc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1343656 Title:

[Bug 1343656] Re: Unable to install crossbuild-essential-powerpc on x86_64 (amd64)

2014-07-17 Thread semi-newbie
Changed defaulted package from build-essential to crossbuild-essential- powerpc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1343656 Title: Unable to install crossbuild-essential-powerpc on x86_64

[Bug 1343656] [NEW] Unable to install crossbuild-essential-powerpc on x86_64 (amd64)

2014-07-17 Thread semi-newbie
Public bug reported: The Ubuntu 14.04LTS 64-bit is installed within a brand-new VM (using VirtualBox 4.3.12). The host machine and the VM are both x86_64 (amd64). I would like to get a powerpc-linux-gnu cross-toolchain up and running, and noticed that Ubuntu had a specific package for this. Fir

[Bug 550023] Re: first boot after installation of lucid beta 1 from dvd iso fails when using encryption

2010-04-01 Thread semi-newbie
The problem reported above was not particular to the dvd iso. Also, I have since found the daily snapshot iso files at cdimage.ubuntu.com. I have just installed the 20100401 amd64 server cd iso using the guided encryption+lvm option, with grub 1 (legacy). I am able to normally boot using this in

[Bug 550023] Re: first boot after installation of lucid beta 1 from dvd iso fails when using encryption

2010-03-30 Thread semi-newbie
In the past I have set up a Karmic machine that used text only, and by specifying "bootwait" (or something like that) into /etc/fstab I was able to get a chance to enter multiple encrypted partition passphrases and to boot properly. Can I somehow instruct the installer to not use plymouth and xspl

[Bug 550023] [NEW] first boot after installation of lucid beta 1 from dvd iso fails when using encryption

2010-03-27 Thread semi-newbie
Public bug reported: Attempted amd64 lucid beta 1 install from dvd iso using two drives, encryption, and lvm with two volume groups. The first time, I tried to use encryption on both drives, and created lvm volume groups on top of each encrypted partition. When I booted, I got the ubuntu logo sc

[Bug 515274] Re: [FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1

2010-03-27 Thread semi-newbie
i386 proved to be unreliable; couldn't even complete the lucid install. Now have built an amd64 system, but am using full-disk encryption and cannot even boot the system to the point where I can attempt to install Chuck Short's PPA. Still trying... -- [FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1 https://bugs.la

[Bug 212075] Re: [hardy beta] encrypting partitions at installation should allow for single passphrase to unlock all

2010-03-25 Thread semi-newbie
This is still a problem even through Karmic (9.10) and Lucid (10.04) beta 1: in various situations, input is eaten, or prompts for decryption of a second device are never received. -- [hardy beta] encrypting partitions at installation should allow for single passphrase to unlock all https://bugs

[Bug 545005] [NEW] rescue feature on lucid beta 1 alternate CD fails to find raid1 device that uses 1.02 metadata format

2010-03-23 Thread semi-newbie
Public bug reported: I have two raid1 drive pairs, two of which comprise /dev/md0 and two of which comprise /dev/md/hitachi2Tb (sometimes with a third-party system rescue CD such as SystemRescueCD 1.5.0, the second raid1shows up as /dev/md1 or /dev/md127). The lucid-beta-1 alternate i386 CD's res

[Bug 515274] Re: [FFE] Latest Stable is 5.0.1

2010-03-19 Thread semi-newbie
I haven't attempted to participate in testing a pre-release Ubuntu package before, so please bear with me. I'd very much like to see Bacula 5.0.x make it into Lucid. I have reformatted a machine with Lucid Alpha 3 to install Chuck Short's test package onto. This machine is i386 rather than amd64

[Bug 426778] Re: Please upgrade calendarserver to version 2.3 from upstream

2010-03-13 Thread semi-newbie
As part of the responses for bug 403349 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calendarserver/+bug/403349), Alex Dean gave a URL http://www.deanspot.org/content/installing-darwin- calendar-server-23-ubuntu-910 that points to his post on his workaround to get CalendarServer working under 9.10 (K

[Bug 182572] Re: Samba Fails to Split GECOS on Comma

2010-01-31 Thread semi-newbie
I attempted to use the prescribed workaround (editing /etc/passwd to remove the ,,, after the name), but this did not work for me. I don't see any change (I still get "User Name,,," in the Start Menu under Windows XP. -- Samba Fails to Split GECOS on Comma https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182572

[Bug 182572] Re: Samba Fails to Split GECOS on Comma

2010-01-19 Thread semi-newbie
I wouldn't want to cause a worse problem than the annoyance I'd be solving. Would editing /etc/passwd to remove the three commas be an effective workaround for this problem? If not, what would be an effective workaround? -- Samba Fails to Split GECOS on Comma https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182

[Bug 500929] [NEW] console output during gcc-4.4-doc installation indicates a problem

2009-12-27 Thread semi-newbie
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcc-4.4-doc I am using Karmic Koala (9.10), fully updated/upgraded. During installation of the documentation package, the following output is emitted: Setting up gcc-4.4-doc (4.4.1-4ubuntu8) ... Ignoring install-info called from maintainer script The pa

[Bug 182591] Re: [needs-packaging] Calendar Server

2009-11-14 Thread semi-newbie
This package appears to exist in a broken form in Karmic, but is not installable because of a version more than 1.5 years old (version 1.2) that is currently bundled depends upon the python-xml package that was dropped after the Jaunty release: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calendarser

[Bug 426778] Re: Please upgrade calendarserver to version 2.3 from upstream

2009-11-14 Thread semi-newbie
I should have mentioned that resolving this bug will also resolve #403349: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calendarserver/+bug/403349 The current version of calendarserver, 1.2, cannot even be installed via apt on Karmic. -- Please upgrade calendarserver to version 2.3 from upstre

[Bug 426778] Re: Please upgrade calendarserver to version 2.3 from upstream

2009-11-14 Thread semi-newbie
+1: AFAIK, DCS is the closest thing we have to a CalDAV server in Ubuntu. Bump!! -- Please upgrade calendarserver to version 2.3 from upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/426778 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ub