[Bug 1505556] Re: lpstat plugin doesn't return job count

2015-10-15 Thread Stevel
** Patch added: "lpstat-return-number-of-jobs-2.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/1505556/+attachment/4495737/+files/lpstat-return-number-of-jobs-2.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 1505556] Re: lpstat plugin doesn't return job count

2015-10-15 Thread Stevel
In addition it seems that the metrics should be GAUGE instead of COUNTER. New patch attached. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505556 Title: lpstat plugin doesn't return job count To

[Bug 1505556] [NEW] lpstat plugin doesn't return job count

2015-10-13 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: Ubuntu release: 14.04.3 LTS munin-plugins-core version: 2.0.19-3 The returned job count is always zero because a variable assignment is missing from the script. ** Affects: munin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "lpstat-return-number-

[Bug 743350] Re: top appears to leak memory

2014-02-17 Thread Stevel
for the record, running Ubuntu 12.04 LTS with procps version 1:3.2.8-11ubuntu6.3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743350 Title: top appears to leak memory To manage notifications abou

[Bug 743350] Re: top appears to leak memory

2014-02-17 Thread Stevel
I've been running top for a few days on a 'forgotten' tty. Now it's using over 3GB of memory... ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 910566] Re: munin does not depend on libcache-cache-perl

2013-06-24 Thread Stevel
The mysql_ plugin from the munin-node package fails. Steps to reproduce: - Install munin-node. Make sure that libcache-cache-perl is not installed yet. - Run /usr/share/munin/plugins/myqsl_ suggest Expected result: a list of possible symlink names to make (in /etc/munin/plugins). Actual result:

[Bug 683897] Re: Buddy list does not show friends on-line

2010-12-07 Thread Stevel
I've added the details. I updated the package myself already using the ubuntu package at http://code.google.com/p/pidgin- facebookchat/wiki/Downloads?tm=2 (direct link: http://pidgin- facebookchat.googlecode.com/files/pidgin-facebookchat-1.69.deb) -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 683897] Re: Buddy list does not show friends on-line

2010-12-07 Thread Stevel
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected ** Description changed: Binary package hint: pidgin-facebookchat The issue is explained further in http://code.google.com/p/pidgin- facebookchat/issues/detail?id=869 - There is a new upstream release of the plugin (1.69) which fixes

[Bug 683897] [NEW] Buddy list does not show friends on-line

2010-12-01 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin-facebookchat The issue is explained further in http://code.google.com/p/pidgin- facebookchat/issues/detail?id=869 There is a new upstream release of the plugin (1.69) which fixes this bug. ** Affects: pidgin-facebookchat (Ubuntu) Importance:

[Bug 458883] Re: [users-admin] deleting a user doesn't work

2009-10-23 Thread Stevel
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34227251/Dependencies.txt -- [users-admin] deleting a user doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 458883] [NEW] [users-admin] deleting a user doesn't work

2009-10-23 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools When clicking on the delete button in the users-admin, the user is removed from the list, but the user is not actually deleted (i.e. remains in /etc/passwd and thus shows up when the users-admin dialog is opened again). ProblemType: Bu

[Bug 438557] Re: ALT-Fx, ALT-left, ALT-right switch VT

2009-09-30 Thread Stevel
The issue seems to be caused by bug #434361 and has been fixed for me with todays usplash-update. ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- ALT-Fx, ALT-left, ALT-right switch VT https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438557 You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 438557] Re: ALT-Fx, ALT-left, ALT-right switch VT

2009-09-29 Thread Stevel
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32668782/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32668783/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32668784/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 438557] [NEW] ALT-Fx, ALT-left, ALT-right switch VT

2009-09-29 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg When in an X session, pressing ALT-F1 to ALT-F6 or ALT-left/right switches the user to the corresponding VT. This happens after the keydown-event is sent to the active X VT. The keyup-event is sent to the X application when the user switches back to

[Bug 432304] Re: Unable to see selfsigned https pages with localized Firefox

2009-09-19 Thread Stevel
The same bug appears in the dutch version of Firefox. When running firefox without localization (LANG=C) the 'untrusted connection' warning appears as expected. -- Unable to see selfsigned https pages with localized Firefox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432304 You received this bug notification

[Bug 404037] Re: Photo is not shown in the 'view and edit a photo'-mode

2009-07-24 Thread Stevel
After minimizing and restoring f-spot, the area of the photo is shown gray. ** Attachment added: "Schermafdruk-F-Spot-1.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29481251/Schermafdruk-F-Spot-1.png -- Photo is not shown in the 'view and edit a photo'-mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404037 You re

[Bug 404037] Re: Photo is not shown in the 'view and edit a photo'-mode

2009-07-24 Thread Stevel
** Attachment added: "Schermafdruk-F-Spot.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29481197/Schermafdruk-F-Spot.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29481198/Dependencies.txt -- Photo is not shown in the 'view and edit a photo'-mode https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 404037] [NEW] Photo is not shown in the 'view and edit a photo'-mode

2009-07-24 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: f-spot When switching from the browse photos to view/edit photo mode in f-spot, the photo is not shown. What is shown instead is what was previously shown in that place. The space around where the photo should be becomes white (as it should be). The attac

[Bug 399617] Re: Please merge audacious-plugins 2.1-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2009-07-22 Thread Stevel
Because of the outdated audacious-plugins (compared to the other audacious-related packages) it's impossible to install audacious because of a dependency conflict, so this should be more severe than just a wishlist item. #apt-get install audacious audacious: Depends: audacious-plugins (> 2.0) bu

[Bug 383384] Re: Xorg crashes entering fullscreen with compiz enabled

2009-06-03 Thread Stevel
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27472655/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27472656/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27472657/Dependencies.txt ** A

[Bug 383384] [NEW] Xorg crashes entering fullscreen with compiz enabled

2009-06-03 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel After todays upgrade, when entering fullscreen with compiz enabled, X crashes and gdm restarts. This happens with different programs. i've encountered this with evince and firefox. Maximizing gnome-terminal does not crash X. The

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2009-04-07 Thread stevel
Russell Philips wrote: > I don't think the problem is so much the 'one-click install' that some users > expect. It's the security implications of installing software that's exempt > from automatic updates through apt. Doesn't Firefox/Thunderbird have this same issue? I don't think (fta or someo

[Bug 344196] Re: Songbird hangs on song change

2009-03-17 Thread stevel
This is being tracked in our upstream (Songbird) bugzilla as bug 15401: http://bugzilla.songbirdnest.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15401 It seems to be affecting both the Ubuntu & Fedora packages. Our current suspicion is locally-applied GStreamer patches (though we don't have anything conclusive yet) **

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2009-01-28 Thread stevel
asac: Has there been any progress on talking with the archive maintainers as to whether or not they'd accept a package with a private XULRunner? Anything I can help with at the moment? -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-12-02 Thread stevel
I'll be coming down Wednesday, Dec. 10th w/ preed (our buildmeister) and a stack of t-shirts. -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing lis

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-12-02 Thread stevel
Jorge - yup, I'm coming to FOSSCamp on Friday & Saturday (12/5 & 12/6). If you want, I can drop by UDS as well - or we can meet at FOSSCamp. (Not sure if folks from the mozilla-team will be at FOSSCamp?) Definitely looking forward to talking. -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-10-24 Thread stevel
@Fabien: We've got some patches awaiting review in BMO for upstreaming, but most of our patches to XULRunner aren't going to get upstreamed anytime soon without some cleanup, effort, and shepherding. I don't foresee us being able to use a clean Mozilla-supplied XULRunner anytime in the immediate f

[Bug 261396] [NEW] rwhod segfaults upon startup when specifying interface to use

2008-08-26 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: This bug is described in the debian bugtracker: http://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=480842, which also has a fix and new packages. ** Affects: netkit-rwho (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- rwhod segfaults upon startup when specifying

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-08-25 Thread stevel
@Manosdoc: Some progress has been made, but the system-wide XULRunner is still a blocker that we're working on. In the meantime, there is a Songbird 0.7 .deb at getdeb.net: http://www.getdeb.net/app/Songbird -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494 You received this

[Bug 259003] Re: Installing aliases for virtual robots automatically

2008-08-18 Thread Stevel
** Attachment added: "list_virtual.tt2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16890093/list_virtual.tt2 -- Installing aliases for virtual robots automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259003 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 259003] Re: Installing aliases for virtual robots automatically

2008-08-18 Thread Stevel
** Attachment added: "Patch for alias_manager.pl" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16890089/alias_manager.patch -- Installing aliases for virtual robots automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259003 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 259003] [NEW] Installing aliases for virtual robots automatically

2008-08-18 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sympa When creating a list for the default robot, the alias_manager automatically creates the new aliases, but for virtual robots, also a file with the virtual aliases is needed. This patch does that. In addition, it removes the need to have write access

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-05-25 Thread stevel
Fabian - will do... thanks, Jorge sent me the writeup - I think the ball is in our (Songbird's) court now, I'll definitely ping you guys if I have follow-up questions/clarifications. -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-05-12 Thread stevel
Awesome, thanks Jorge. -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-05-12 Thread stevel
ither here, or stevel at songbirdnest dot com). That would help speed things up considerably if I could get that to our lawyers. -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-05-12 Thread stevel
We're still working on the trademark/branding guideline/policy. Sorry it's taking so long, but... well... lawyers. :( Sign me up for the mozillateam liasion. And I'll update this when I have more info on the branding guideline. -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-04-30 Thread stevel
Fabien - some of the XULRunner patches aren't being accepted upstream because Mozilla isn't accepting any patches that aren't blocking the release of Firefox 3. -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 94494] Re: [needs-packaging] Songbird

2008-04-16 Thread stevel
(I'm the developer advocate @ Songbird, feel free to ping me with any issues) I'm working on the trademark/branding guideline/policy at the moment. I'll update this bug when I have some results. -- [needs-packaging] Songbird https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/94494 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 135780] Please backport postfix 2.4 to feisty

2007-08-30 Thread Stevel
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: postfix The only changed dependencies are libc 2.5 to 2.6, openssl 0.9.8c to 0.9.8e and a minor update to zlib1g, so it shouldn't be too difficult I think. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport