In the meantime, I have completely reinstalled the system in order to
get further with my project.
So unfortunately I cannot try it. Thank you very much for the feedback.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Trying to upgrade 18.04 to 20.04 with do-release-upgrade fails.
Seems to be an issue with python-minimal dependencies.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.44
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-142.146-generic 4.15.18
Public bug reported:
Disk checked all right using the bootmenu option.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
Package: ubiquity 19.04.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.0.0-13.14-generic 5.0.6
Uname: Linux 5.0.0-13-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
Affects me as well. Mine crashes pretty often even with only a couple of
files, i.e. five or even two. Pretty annoying.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1653531
Title:
New Folder with
@jean-Pierre: Thank you very much, manually overwriting the .bin file
with the one form the commit you mentioned fixed it. Lets hope the fixed
is packaged for 18.04 soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Impact]
* In a multi-domain environment setup with LDAP or IPA, the username is
not parsed correctly, resulting in id mapping issues.
* As a result, NFSv4 cannot be used in a multi-domain environment at
all if the username is of the form
user@authentication_domain@idmap_domain
* The
Public bug reported:
Description
===
It was discovered that QtPass before 1.2.1, when using the built-in password
generator, generates possibly predictable and enumerable passwords. This only
applies to the QtPass GUI. The generator used libc's random(), seeded with
srand(msecs), where
** Patch removed: "1-0.25-5ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1728310/+attachment/4999879/+files/1-0.25-5ubuntu1.debdiff
** Package changed: autofs (Ubuntu) => libnfsidmap (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
This is an updated debdiff for Xenial applicable to libnfsidmap_0.25-5.
Tested successfully on 16.04.03.
** Patch added: "2-0.25-5ubuntu1.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs/+bug/1728310/+attachment/5000612/+files/2-0.25-5ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug
This is a debdiff for Xenial applicable to libnfsidmap_0.25-5. I built this in
pbuilder
and it builds successfully, and I installed it, the patch works as intended.
** Patch removed: "03-nss.c.patch"
Public bug reported:
Environment: IPA + NFSv4 (sec=krb5).
nss.c uses wrong '@' sign to detect the NFS domain resulting in "nobody"
ownerships and the following error messages in an IPA environment:
Oct 25 16:49:42 ubuntu-16.04-client.sub.localdomain nfsidmap[6163]: key:
0x2c254c26 type: uid
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1691025 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691025
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1691025
Installing xpra on HWE-enabled LTS breaks system
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Greetings,
Have you ever tried that stuff before? It's something gorgeous, just take a
look http://comprehensive.rebelselector.com/c4c5
ulischroeder
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I've noticed the bug on Xenial.
** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1669957
Title:
/etc/auto.smb does not detect kerberos
Public bug reported:
The presence of a kerberos ticket is not detected by /etc/auto.smb
within the method get_krb5_cache if the ticket is stored in the keyring.
Wrong behaviour:
$ klist
Ticket cache: KEYRING:persistent:YYY:krb_ccache_cjPUxaM
Default principal: ulif@XXX
Valid starting Expires
Version 0.9.1 fixes this bug for armhf and aarch6. I'm using Docker on
both platforms and I'm happy to see that the network startup won't get
confused any more by ubuntu-fan (like version 0.9.0 did). This is what I
can confirm.
What I cannot conform is if 0.9.1 has any impact for people who rely
> @Uli, It's an automated dependency.
I know.
The question is: Should I modify /etc/network/fan if I'm using private
IP addresses outside of 10.254/16, 172.16/12, 192.168/16, e.g. 10/24 ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
I've have docker.io installed, but I didn't modify /etc/default/ubuntu-
fan nor /etc/network/fan.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551747
Title:
ubuntu-fan causes issues during
Version 0.9.1 fixes the bug for armhf and aarch64 in the way that I
won't get an error message any more. I don't use a fan configuration so
cannot tell anything about possible side effects for (active) fan users.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I faced the same issue with an embedded LEX 2I260D-H26 on Ubuntu 16.04
both in kernels 4.6. I faced an issue where (when not blacklisting the
gma500_gfx driver via /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf), the HDMI screen
would stay black, unless the HDMI cable was NOT plugged in during boot
in which case
I have the same problem with an Acer ES1-111. I installing the xenial
4.4.0-15 kernel fixed the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1558489
Title:
touchpad stopped working
To
The patched package is somewhat outdated now. Wish this were finally
included in the official linux-firmware.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475639
Title:
No adapter found in
I meant included in linux-firmware, not just linux-lts-utopic. I am on
15.10 with the same issue, and the patch works, but it means downgrading
the linux-firmware package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I have the same problem on a Lenovo Thinkpad T420. Since upgrading from
12.04 to 14.04 the volume keys - in my case dedicated keys - responds
with a huge (several seconds) delay. This is not always the case. It
looks like the process handling those events gets blocked somehow.
--
You received
Hello Joseph,
before issuing an upstream bug report I tried the first stable release
of 3.18 [0] and I wasn't able to reproduce the bug so far. So you may
suspend or keep this bug report on hold. I'd really like to know if
there is some incidence (i.e. a specific commit) for this bug being
fixed
I there anything I can do next?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I tried the 3.18-rc4 kernel, the bug is also there:
Nov 16 07:16:39 box kernel: [34280.152007] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup -
CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [clamscan:2868]
Nov 16 07:16:39 box kernel: [34280.152007] Modules linked in: xt_multiport
iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables gpio_ich
If I totally disable any sound output or even the whole sound subsystem,
do you think this will decrease the likelihood of this bug to appear?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
eeab517b68beb9e044e869bee18e3bdfa60e5aca exhibits the bug (quite early
this time, only 100s after starting the checks)
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
94daf85e3c4db3b804205277eec7c4eae6efe9db is clean
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
a6bc732b5a96b5403c2637e85c350b95ec6591f3: clean
a3183c60e3e9be7abd830ebed904491625e07d2e: clean
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
a6bc732b5a96b5403c2637e85c350b95ec6591f3: clean
5e1109adde6acd0f3424886da09402ac22ed244b: clean
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
a6bc732b5a96b5403c2637e85c350b95ec6591f3: clean
8a5dc585d50015af9c079ae2d182dc4c1cd22914: bug
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
a6bc732b5a96b5403c2637e85c350b95ec6591f3: clean
23b4faa9a36257e75dade0f2945bc3e487e6f463:
Is there anything I should test next?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
86467ff2ddca94c0d8d10b92b5916e68c0cad8a9: clean
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
a6bc732b5a96b5403c2637e85c350b95ec6591f3: clean
23b4faa9a36257e75dade0f2945bc3e487e6f463: clean
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
a6bc732b5a96b5403c2637e85c350b95ec6591f3: clean
a6bc732b5a96b5403c2637e85c350b95ec6591f3: clean
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
a6bc732b5a96b5403c2637e85c350b95ec6591f3: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
2026d24ef2ea8caad5e87662a58075e930ccab63: clean
c2d33069915d1f9b3b1dcc2199af11d4e072b037: bug
5cbb3d216e2041700231bcfc383ee5f8b7fc8b74:
c2d33069915d1f9b3b1dcc2199af11d4e072b037: exhibits this bug
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
c2d33069915d1f9b3b1dcc2199af11d4e072b037: bug
5cbb3d216e2041700231bcfc383ee5f8b7fc8b74: bug
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: seems to be clean, did the
check twice.
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
f095ca6b31cfd20e6e7e0338ed8548d8a4374287: clean
5cbb3d216e2041700231bcfc383ee5f8b7fc8b74: bug
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
3.13 final: bug
--
You
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: seems to be clean, did the
check twice.
3.12 final: clean
f9efbce6334844c7f8b9b9459f6d7a6fbc2928e0: clean
5cbb3d216e2041700231bcfc383ee5f8b7fc8b74: bug
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
3.13 final: bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
5cbb3d216e2041700231bcfc383ee5f8b7fc8b74: bug
[ 908.144025] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1:173]
[ 908.144025] Modules linked in: xt_multiport iptable_filter ip_tables
x_tables gpio_ich snd_hda_codec_realtek coretemp snd_hda_intel serio_raw
snd_hda_codec pl2303 usbserial
3.12 final: clean
3.12.14: clean
3.12.21: clean
3.12.25: clean
3.12.27: clean
...
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc2-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc3-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc5-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc6-generic: bug
3.13 final: bug
--
You received this bug notification because
3.12 final: clean
3.12.14: clean
3.12.21: clean
3.12.25: clean
3.12.27: clean
3.12.28: clean
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc2-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc3-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc5-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc6-generic: bug
3.13 final: bug
Is there any kernel version before
3.12 final: clean
3.12.14: clean
...
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc2-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc3-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc5-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc6-generic: bug
3.13 final: bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
3.12 final: clean
3.12.14: clean
3.12.21: clean
...
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc2-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc3-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc5-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc6-generic: bug
3.13 final: bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
3.12 final: clean
3.12.14: clean
3.12.21: clean
3.12.25: clean
...
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc2-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc3-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc5-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc6-generic: bug
3.13 final: bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
3.13.0-031300rc2-generic: exhibits this bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1]
To manage notifications about this bug go
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: exhibits this bug
I'll try v3.12.14-trusty next
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1]
To manage
For the records:
3.12 final: clean
...
3.13.0-031300rc1-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc2-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc3-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc5-generic: bug
3.13.0-031300rc6-generic: bug
3.13 final: bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Hello Joseph,
the last kernel, you have prepared for testing contains this bug.
I've just noticed that 3.13.0-031300rc3-generic kernel contains the bug
the bug as well, so the bisect went in the wrong direction. Sorry for
this. I'll have a deeper look inside, hoping to understand why the bug
OK, I didn't install the linux-image-extra package, it wasn't necessary
with the other kernels I've tested before. With this package installed,
the kernel boots properly, but
c6c1f325: exhibits this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The v3.13-rc3 build instead is running well.
** Attachment added: dmesg.3.13.0-031300rc3.201312061335.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1356558/+attachment/4200927/+files/dmesg.3.13.0-031300rc3.201312061335.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I'd like to test the kernel, but this particular build doesn't come up
with support for networking nor usb keyboard. I've attached the
dmesg.gz.
** Attachment added: dmesg.3.13.0-36.63~lp1356558v1.gz
Hi Joseph,
unfortunately the kernel you are offering for testing is for the amd64
platform, but I need it for the i386 platform.
Regards
Uli
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
c6c1f325adc8a8e0cd06c6ad0ca232a6880a1783: exhibits this bug:
Sep 8 22:18:29 box kernel: [ 1940.144024] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for
22s! [md3_raid1:172]
Sep 8 22:18:29 box kernel: [ 1940.144024] Modules linked in: xt_multiport
iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables gpio_ich
308d17ef9530f236466a31a7855fc3d5176292d4: doesn't exhibit this bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1]
To manage
308d17ef9530f236466a31a7855fc3d5176292d4: exhibits this bug
Sorry for the confusion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1]
v3.13-rc3: doesn't exhibit this bug
v3.13-rc6: exhibits this bug
I'll try v3.13-rc4 and v3.13-rc5 next, but http://kernel.ubuntu.com
/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.13-rc4-trusty/ seems to be incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
v3.13-rc5: exhibits this bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
is there any kernel I should try next?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU stuck for 22s! [md3_raid1]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
3.12 Final: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.12-trusty/
doesn't seem to have this regression
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1356558
Title:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU
Public bug reported:
Hi,
this bug appeared in Ubuntu 14.04, Ubuntu 12.04 didn't show this behavior.
I've found a possible predecessor in bug #212684.
Switching to a recent mainline kernel didn't fix this issue.
Starting
$ /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray /dev/md3
will repeat this behavior.
regression no: v3.13 Final:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.13-trusty/
regression yes: v3.13.5:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.13.5-trusty/
not tested: v3.13.11.4:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.13.11.4-trusty/
--
You received this bug
Update
regression yes (but significantly later : v3.13 Final:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.13-trusty/
regression yes: v3.13.5:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.13.5-trusty/
not tested: v3.13.11.4:
So, same problem here.
Live 13.10 USB key created with usb-creator-gtk, tried on a Dell
Latitude E6400.
Yesterday, with an unformatted hard disk, it worked: live system came up
without trouble.
Today, with a harddisk formatted ext4 (whole disk; no partitions),
doesn't work. Boot bails out with
@ Larry Sirius
That is great to hear! I'll try and dig out the old card to test this over the
weekend.
@nobody
You dont have to use a USB Card. You can trick Lenovos whitelisting by using
the WWAN slot instead of the WLAN slot. But it sounds like thanks to Larry
Fingers work this wount be
@ Christopher
If you read the comments above you will find that this bug is most definetly
not fixed!
I also changed the wireless the card from my laptop, which is the only proper
workaround. If you want I can install the old card to confirm it is still not
working properly, but the word of
@ Christopher
Am I understanding you correctly? Do you seriously want each user affected by
this bug to file a duplicate bug report?
Should Koen file one for each of his 228 cards, or just one bug report per user
and devise?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
@karneseric
Providing drivers is really up to the manufacturer.
You might have better luck exchanging the WLAN card for a supported
moddel if you can.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This bug is also still present in raring.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/816669
Title:
encrypted-home support in new user dialog
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Am I correct in assuming that this bug has only been corrected for
quantal, eventhough precise is the LTS? This error also occurs with the
HP dl360g2 server when PXE booting with ubuntu 12.04 amd64 server
version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 854833 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/854833
Happens to me as well on a Lenovo Thinkpad T420. This is really
annoying.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Background:
- I am behind a proxy with everything set up properly in network settings
- Everytime there is a flashplugin update it fails to atomatically install
through the update manager (separate bug *)
- I manually install/update it by running sudo apt-get remove
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1037942
Title:
update notifier says update failed to install even after its installed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Description changed:
Background:
- I am behind a proxy with everything set up properly in network settings
- Everytime there is a flashplugin update it fails to atomatically install
through the update manager (separate bug *)
- I manually install/update it by running sudo apt-get
Hi Michael, yes I am running ubuntu 12.04 64bit.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947916
Title:
Software Center does not find Adobe Reader
To manage notifications about this bug go
Public bug reported:
When right clicking on some images (example attached) nautilus hangs.
This does not happen on older nautilus versions (nautilus 2.30.1 in
Ubuntu 10.04 64Bit)
Steps needed to reporduce this bug:
- Download the example image
- right ckick on it
- select properties
PS: The
** Attachment added: HeLa_10x_2H_scale.tif
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034816/+attachment/3254177/+files/HeLa_10x_2H_scale.tif
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034816
Title:
** Description changed:
- When right clicking on some images (example attached) nautilus hangs.
+ When opening the properties window for some images (example attached)
+ nautilus hangs.
This does not happen on older nautilus versions (nautilus 2.30.1 in
Ubuntu 10.04 64Bit)
-
Steps
just tested and it also works without issue with PCManFM (0.9.10)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1034816
Title:
Natulis property window hangs with some picture files
To manage
I can confirm this bug.
After activating partner repos I can also find it when searching for
acroread, but that is the package name, not the name of the
application. It is not found when searching Acrobat Reader, Acrobat,
Adobe or Adobe Reader
--
You received this bug notification because you
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 995916 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995916
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 995916
No launcher icon or Alt+Tab entry for Gimp windows
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Why is this taking so long? The 12.04 release is completely boken using
the new amd servers. I would classify this as a major compatibility
issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979003
My Girlfriend also has a x121e with the same problems, so I replaced her WLAN
card.
For those wanting to do the same: The trick is to plug the card into the spare
mini PCIe slot and not the WLAN card slot. This way the BIOS will not complain
about unsuproted hardware. The spare slot is meant
I can confrim that signing in is now possible. (Even though it gets
stuck at some points at getting information, the set up can be
finished by clicking continue. )
After signing in used space, Devices, and Account information are
displayed correctly. However, File Sync is still not able to
Exellent!
I can confrim it works after installing ubuntuone-client-proxy!
(Proxy without authentication)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387308
Title:
HTTPS Proxy Support for file
Public bug reported:
both 3.2.0-23-generic-pae and 3.2.0-23-generic-pae seem to suffer from
this problem. 3.2.0-21-generic-pae was ok.
ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-23-generic-pae 3.2.0-23.36
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-23.36-generic-pae
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979627
Title:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffdc
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
Kernel crash at Unity 2d login. Home volume is nfs4.
ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-22-generic-pae 3.2.0-22.35
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-21.34-generic-pae 3.2.13
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-21-generic-pae i686
AlsaVersion:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977291
Title:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffdc
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/977296
Title:
BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffdc
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
Kernel crash at Unity 2D login. Home volume on nfs4. Everything works
fine with Kernel 3.2.0-21.
ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: linux-image-3.2.0-22-generic-pae 3.2.0-22.35
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-21.34-generic-pae 3.2.13
Uname: Linux
Hi,
thanks for your help! Currently I'm travelling and no oneiric box is
availiable to me. I hope I can test this during the next weekend. Stay
tuned!
Best regards,
Ulrich.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
At university we have a Proxy for wired connections:
Mac Filtering, No Authentication, Port 8080, Proxy not transparent
some ports, such as the one used for facebook-chat, appear to be open
without proxy, but not many.
(WLAN uses the same proxy + cysco anyconnect VPN)
--
You received this bug
Im on oneiric, but the only package i could find was bitcoind...
which has no gui.
To install bitcoin I used this PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~stretch/+archive/bitcoin (packages for natty)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
In addition to 10.04 I can also confirm this bug for 11.10 alpha.
** Changed in: partman-base (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756853
I can also confirm this bug.
As a workaround the partitions can be created from a live disk before
installing, as described here: http://askubuntu.com/questions/55214/how-
do-i-correctly-align-partions-on-a-hdd-with-sector-size-of-4096-bytes.
--
You received this bug notification because you
I can not confirm this with the latest client (0.3.23-beta).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/758398
Title:
Bitcoin top-level window unmapped
To manage notifications about this bug go
As a workaround you can write color black at the beginning of the
formula.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720931
Title:
formulas in formel editor are grey, not black
To manage
1 - 100 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
