[Bug 989686] [NEW] package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2012-04-27 Thread Bala Subrahmanyam Varanasi
Public bug reported: This happened while upgrading my computer to Ubuntu 12.04 ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: cyrus-common-2.4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic-pae 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu6 Architecture:

[Bug 989686] Re: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 75

2012-04-27 Thread Bala Subrahmanyam Varanasi
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989686 Title: package cyrus-common-2.4 2.4.12-2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned

[Bug 455461] Re: Sound Juicer depends on deprecated libmusicbrainz4

2011-08-17 Thread varanasi
The problem was tracked down three months ago, the sound juice developers released a fix, and it's still not fixed in Lucid? I'm not sure what the S in LTS stands for. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 711139] [NEW] A fatal error has been detected by java environment

2011-02-01 Thread Bala Subrahmanyam Varanasi
Public bug reported: [Fatal Error] :1:1: Premature end of file. # # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0xb5902fec, pid=14600, tid=2975857520 # # JRE version: 6.0_20-b20 # Java VM: OpenJDK Client VM (19.0-b09 mixed mode, sharing linux-x86 ) #

[Bug 664460] Re: Need Version Update for Lucid

2010-11-18 Thread varanasi
Ubuntu just pushed 2.30.3 as an upgrade. Why can't we get the Maverick version? The one without a privacy/security hole? Lucid is supposed to be an LTS release. I don't think the idea is to force users of an LTS release to use defective software longer than everyone else. -- Need Version

[Bug 664460] Re: Need Version Update for Lucid

2010-10-23 Thread varanasi
** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- Need Version Update for Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 664460] [NEW] Need Version Update for Lucid

2010-10-21 Thread varanasi
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: empathy The current lucid version of empathy, listed by ubuntu as 2.30.0, automatically and without warning logs all chats. There is not option to disable the logging. This is a significant privacy and security problem. I believe that in the current

[Bug 664460] Re: Need Version Update for Lucid

2010-10-21 Thread varanasi
-- Need Version Update for Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 664460] Re: Need Version Update for Lucid

2010-10-21 Thread varanasi
** Tags added: empathy lucid-updates -- Need Version Update for Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 664460] Re: Need Version Update for Lucid

2010-10-21 Thread varanasi
Thanks Sebastien, but I don't particularly want to use Gnome 2.32. I would simply like a version of empathy without the huge privacy/security hole in it. Auto-logging every chat, combined with the fact that the logs are in a hidden folder, seems like a bug to me. It probably seemed like a bug

[Bug 664460] Re: Need Version Update for Lucid

2010-10-21 Thread varanasi
** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- Need Version Update for Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/664460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 509774] Re: Send to Empathy

2010-05-06 Thread varanasi
@ sebastien It won't allow selection of any AIM contacts either. Does empathy support filetransfert for AOL? -- Send to Empathy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)

2010-04-10 Thread varanasi
** Changed in: network-manager Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: network-manager Status: Confirmed = New -- Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification

[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)

2010-04-10 Thread varanasi
** Changed in: network-manager Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: network-manager Status: Confirmed = New -- Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211631 You received this bug notification

[Bug 211631] Re: Network is brought down before network filesystems are unmounted (CIFS timeout at shutdown)

2010-04-09 Thread varanasi
I agree with Tom's overall point. This is a serious usability problem for people where I work. We use a script as a partial workaround but it's impossible to make the script work everywhere. This really should be fixed before the LTS. -- Network is brought down before network filesystems are

[Bug 267371] Re: [gvfs] [smb] Damaged OpenOffice files from samba shares

2010-01-31 Thread varanasi
The NAS shares are mounted using fstab. Here's the relevant line from fstab for one of the NAS shares: //nest/home /media/Home cifs uid=1000,rw,iocharset=utf8,username=**,password=*** 0 0 My OO version is the same. One difference is that I used an .ods file -- [gvfs] [smb]

[Bug 267371] Re: [gvfs] [smb] Damaged OpenOffice files from samba shares

2010-01-30 Thread varanasi
Yikes. I believe that as of the recent fuse/samba update (this AM), this bug is back in Karmic with OO 3.1. Open a spreadsheet from an NAS in OO Save the spreadsheet back to the NAS, (there seems to be a short freeze after what looks in OO like a normal save) quit OO Re-Open the spreadsheet in

[Bug 509774] Re: Send to Empathy

2010-01-29 Thread varanasi
@Bruno #6 - Perfect description -- Send to Empathy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509774 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 428703] Re: Firefox search bar bug -Auto highlight

2010-01-27 Thread varanasi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 438868 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438868 I agree with Tars. This isn't an autocomplete bug. It happens on any entry into the address bar after a pause in using Firefox. #11 is a workaround. -- Firefox search bar bug -Auto highlight

[Bug 509774] Re: Send to Empathy

2010-01-27 Thread varanasi
Bruno: Same problem if logged in on empathy. Cannot send a file to empathy. The choose contact option is greyed out. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- Send to Empathy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/509774 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 473662] Re: Empathy will not save Alias names for Yahoo account.

2009-12-16 Thread varanasi
Here's the link for reporting an empathy bug. This one is sort of reported but not as well as you did it: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=empathy The closest report is filed as related to windows:

[Bug 345834] Re: Corrupted preferences dialog in Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (recent update)

2009-03-20 Thread varanasi
I can confirm a similar if not identical problem. The update apparently changed or corrupted the standard chrome files. Similar problem with chrome for account settings/server dialog. ** Attachment added: Image of preferences screen