[Bug 1886831] Re: whitelist 64-bit time syscalls

2020-09-07 Thread xantares
hello, could someone help get that patch get merged ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886831 Title: whitelist 64-bit time syscalls To manage notifications about this bug go to: https

[Bug 1886831] Re: whitelist 64-bit time syscalls

2020-08-14 Thread xantares
is there a git repository for ubuntu's docker.io package where I could submit the update ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886831 Title: whitelist 64-bit time syscalls To manage noti

[Bug 1886831] Re: whitelist 64-bit time syscalls

2020-08-05 Thread xantares
I just rebuilt docker-doc_19.03.6-0ubuntu1~18.04.1_all.deb (in bionic) with this patch: apt-get source docker.io && cd docker.io-19.03.6/ && curl -L https://github.com/docker/docker-ce/commit/3c5d28f12ba6f3839ae77837633372993a073f57.patch | patch -p1 && dpkg-source --commit && debuild -us -uc I

[Bug 1886831] Re: whitelist 64-bit time syscalls

2020-07-30 Thread xantares
this is a feature request for the docker version in bionic/focal to pick up a commit from v19.03.9 to allow these syscalls (or update these packages to 19.03.9) the libseccomp SRU was a necessary condition to allow such a backport (in other words the syscalls were blocked at the libseccomp level,

[Bug 1886831] Re: whitelist 64-bit time syscalls

2020-07-29 Thread xantares
** Summary changed: - whitelist 64-bit time_t syscalls + whitelist 64-bit time syscalls -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886831 Title: whitelist 64-bit time syscalls To manage notifi

[Bug 1886831] Re: whitelist 64-bit time_t syscalls

2020-07-29 Thread xantares
I ran more tests, and the first version to work is 19.03.9, I wonder if an update would be possible: bionic: 19.03.6 => 19.03.9 focal: 19.03.8 => 19.03.9 groovy: 19.03.11 ok -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 1886831] Re: whitelist 64-bit time_t syscalls

2020-07-08 Thread xantares
993a073f57 here is a testcase that ends up calling utimensat_time64 via docker: cd /tmp && git clone https://github.com/xantares/test-seccomp-time64.git && docker build test-seccomp-time64 this affects bionic, but also focal as the same version 19.03 is used -- You rece

[Bug 1886831] Re: whitelist 64-bit time_t syscalls

2020-07-08 Thread xantares
/files these changes need to be applied to the docker.io file "components/engine/profiles/seccomp/default.json" (moby sources are included in docker.io sources) here is a testcase that ends up calling utimensat_time64 via docker: cd /tmp && git clone https://github

[Bug 1886831] [NEW] whitelist 64-bit time_t syscalls

2020-07-08 Thread xantares
the docker.io file "components/engine/profiles/seccomp/default.json" (moby sources are included in docker.io sources) here is a testcase that ends up calling utimensat_time64 via docker: cd /tmp && git clone https://github.com/xantares/test-seccomp-time64.git && docker

[Bug 1868720] Re: backport time64 syscalls whitelist

2020-03-26 Thread xantares
Focal may be affected after all then -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868720 Title: backport time64 syscalls whitelist To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1868720] Re: backport time64 syscalls whitelist

2020-03-26 Thread xantares
turns ou we may also need this fix in docker: https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/40739 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868720 Title: backport time64 syscalls whitelist To manage notif

[Bug 1868720] Re: backport time64 syscalls whitelist

2020-03-25 Thread xantares
of course, you do: cd /tmp && git clone https://github.com/xantares/test-seccomp-time64.git && docker build test-seccomp-time64 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug

[Bug 1868720] Re: backport time64 syscalls whitelist

2020-03-24 Thread xantares
** Patch added: "backport time64 syscalls from 2.4.2 into 2.4.1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/+bug/1868720/+attachment/5340882/+files/libseccomp241-time64.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1868720] [NEW] backport time64 syscalls whitelist

2020-03-24 Thread xantares
Public bug reported: A number of new *time64 syscalls are introduced in newer kernel series (>=5.1.x): 403: clock_gettime64 404: clock_settime64 405: clock_adjtime64 406: clock_getres_time64 407: clock_nanosleep_time64 408: timer_gettime64 409: timer_settime64 410: timerfd_gettime64 411: timerfd_

[Bug 1861780] [NEW] update to 1.6.1

2020-02-04 Thread xantares
Public bug reported: hello, could it be updated to 1.6.1 ? https://github.com/jeromerobert/hmat-oss/releases/tag/1.6.1 ** Affects: hmat-oss (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 1851912] [NEW] arpack.hpp is missing

2019-11-09 Thread xantares
Public bug reported: can we sync to 3.7.0-3 in debian sid that has the fix to include arpack.hpp for ubuntu 20.04 ? it is possible to backport it for 18.04 ? ** Affects: arpack (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: can we sync to 3.7.0-3 in debian s

[Bug 1838532] [NEW] update to new release

2019-07-31 Thread xantares
Public bug reported: nlopt got some updates, currently it is at 2.6.1 see https://github.com/stevengj/nlopt/releases it would be cool to have some newer release of nlopt for the LTS thanks for maintaining ** Affects: nlopt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You receive

[Bug 1755250] Re: backport statx syscall whitelist fix

2019-03-08 Thread xantares
Has this been released ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755250 Title: backport statx syscall whitelist fix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/u

[Bug 1755250] Re: backport statx syscall whitelist fix

2019-02-28 Thread xantares
Ok for me too, I just installed libseccomp2_2.3.1-2.1ubuntu4.1_amd64.deb and it works: Step 16/18 : RUN gcc test-statx.c -o test-statx ---> Running in 501935bb923d Removing intermediate container 501935bb923d ---> a47f15cd6fc8 Step 17/18 : RUN touch test-file ---> Running in 1038f76ad915 Removi

[Bug 1817736] [NEW] cmake config file is missing

2019-02-26 Thread xantares
Public bug reported: The libcminpack-dev subpackage misses the CMinpackConfig.cmake file: $ cat debian/libcminpack-dev.install usr/include/cminpack-1/*.h usr/lib/*/libcminpack.so usr/lib/*/pkgconfig/cminpack.pc We can see it is part of the package: /usr/bin/cmake -P cmake_install.cmake -- Insta

[Bug 1755250] Re: backport statx syscall whitelist fix

2019-02-20 Thread xantares
hello, how long does it take usually for ubuntu to review the changes ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755250 Title: backport statx syscall whitelist fix To manage notifications ab

[Bug 1755250] Re: backport statx syscall whitelist fix

2019-02-07 Thread xantares
here is a patch against libseccomp 2.3.1 in bionic (on top of the debian risc port patch) I manually applied changes from libseccomp 2.3.3 that reference the statx syscalls for the risc part i used the diff from https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/blob/2a70ad4f3e8ab80e88f0662a760f4ef1d9219205/

[Bug 1755250] Re: backport statx syscall whitelist fix

2018-03-13 Thread xantares
Unfortunately that's not recent enough: the bug has just been fixed a few days ago and will need some backporting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1755250 Title: backport statx syscall

[Bug 1755250] [NEW] backport statx syscall whitelist fix

2018-03-12 Thread xantares
Public bug reported: Hello maintainer, The docker version 17.03 (bionic) in ubuntu doesn't allow the statx syscall which is needed to build qt >=5.10 applications: https://github.com/docker/for-linux/issues/208#issuecomment-372400859 Could this fix be backported in the ubuntu package ? https://

[Bug 1425701] Re: Unity stopped working after upgrade

2015-02-26 Thread xantares
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1424013 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424013 if you downgraded compiz and experienced the same issues, how can you tell it's from the compiz package ? I uninstalled nvidia (304) drivers (lsmod shows nouveau), downgraded compiz & unity, and I'm still

[Bug 1425701] Re: Unity stopped working after upgrade

2015-02-26 Thread xantares
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1424013 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424013 Hi, How did you disable X11 sync in compiz, preferably in command line ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad