Re: [Bug 362629] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 rc does not boot on k8

2009-04-24 Thread zosX
Well, I'm booting off a virtual partition and getting the same problem. Clearly its something wrong with the USB detection and power management. It may be be that my bios has an error, that someone just uncovered. The latest build is still exhibiting the same problem. -z- -- Ubuntu 9.04 rc does

[Bug 362629] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 rc does not boot on k8

2009-04-18 Thread zosX
I have the same problem here. SiS Chipset, Athlon 64 3000. The ACPI option at boot only gets so far as well before it dumps into busybox (usually around the USB detection). Not fun. I was greatly looking foward to this release as it seems driver situation for ATI has improved. I'll be watching

[Bug 362629] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 rc does not boot on k8

2009-04-18 Thread zosX
I should add that trying both 32 and 64-bit flavors yield identical results. Somethings fishy with the new kernel -- Ubuntu 9.04 rc does not boot on k8 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362629 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

Re: [Bug 362629] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 rc does not boot on k8

2009-04-18 Thread zosX
I would like to add that I used the daily and got the same result. Waiting for a while and exiting busybox allowed it to continue to boot. I should also add that this was installed via wubi on an XP partition. I know its not related to this bug, but upon installation it asks to install to a

[Bug 362629] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 rc does not boot on k8

2009-04-18 Thread zosX
First of all I apologize if this is posted twice. I responded via e-mail first and didn't see the response listed on the bug report page so if it does appear spontaneously from the ethereal void, you'll know why. I would like to add that I used the daily and got the same result. Waiting for a

Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2009-02-17 Thread zosX
Yes. Please close this bug report. I don't want to help any more people troubleshoot their messed up partition tables. :P -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a

Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2009-01-31 Thread zosX
with Ibex and I specifically remember 8.04 seeing my windows partition when I installed last on this drive. Any help would be appreciated. Sorry for the lack of logs or screen shots as I don't have many good ways to capture from the installer CD. -zosX -- Intrepid Ibex installer does

Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-12-30 Thread zosX
Sure. Make sure that your file table is correct and in proper order. That was my initial problem. I believe that I used cfdisk to show the partitions. Make sure that any extended partitions only contain logical drives. I had a logical drive somehow marked as a primary partition. Changing the bit

Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-12-30 Thread zosX
I'd still try to delete that extended partition and recreate it. Sounds like your partition table is pretty screwed to me. Rewriting it with windows or something might help. I don't think anything will work for you without changes to the table somehow. Unallocated space doesn't just suddenly

Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-12-30 Thread zosX
good ways to capture from the installer CD. -zosX -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-12-30 Thread zosX
that anyone else was having this probem with Ibex and I specifically remember 8.04 seeing my windows partition when I installed last on this drive. Any help would be appreciated. Sorry for the lack of logs or screen shots as I don't have many good ways to capture from the installer CD. -zosX

[Bug 263813] Re: graphics do not look smooth - even on some major sites

2008-12-06 Thread zosX
I'm having the same issue. Specifically on google. Here is what my homepage looks like in google. On other sites the graphics display fine. I'm guessing the issue is not with ubuntu but firefox 3 on linux in general. ** Attachment added: google2.png

[Bug 263813] Re: graphics do not look smooth - even on some major sites

2008-12-06 Thread zosX
Here is another shot of google. Something funny going on here. ** Attachment added: google1.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20264067/google1.png -- graphics do not look smooth - even on some major sites https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263813 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-28 Thread zosX
Same problem on the release candidate. cfdisk is now on the iso, and that also seems to report the correct table information. I think I can safely rule out that there is something wrong with my partition table. Isn't the installer partitioning utility based on gparted? Both show nothing just an

[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-28 Thread zosX
Sorry for all the comments (squeaky wheel, hehe). Also you might want to notice that the drive sizes are listed differently between cfdisk/fdisk and gparted. I think therein lies a clue. The ONLY software that refuses to correctly report the drive capacity and the partition table so far is

[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-28 Thread zosX
Partition Table for /dev/sdb First Last # Type Sector Sector OffsetLength Filesystem Type (ID) Flag -- --- --- --- -- --- 1 Primary 0 139588784 63 139588785 HPFS/NTFS (07)

[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-28 Thread zosX
Actuall I fail altogether. You cannot have a primary partition existing in a extended partition. Don't know why I didn't see that right away. I also have no clue as to how that happened. Partition table corruption? Strange. Deleting the partition in cfdisk makes it readable in gparted. Issue

[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-12 Thread zosX
The latest snapshot still does not show my partitions. Ubuntu's console fdisk shows them fine while the installer and gparted do not. Seeing as how I made the partitions with gparted in the first place, there should not be a conflict here. Writing the table from the console fdisk does nothing to

[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-12 Thread zosX
Scratch that. I just didn't see the file. Here you go: ** Attachment added: gpartedfail http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18461947/gpartedfail -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification

[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-12 Thread zosX
Stupid windowshere is the file :) ** Attachment added: gpartedfail.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18461980/gpartedfail.png -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 278159] Re: Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-10 Thread zosX
Did the 10/08 snapshot fix it yet? Seems like they had this bug before in 7.04 from reading through the bug reports. Perhaps it is the same bug rearing its ugly head again. -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You

[Bug 278159] [NEW] Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives

2008-10-04 Thread zosX
for the lack of logs or screen shots as I don't have many good ways to capture from the installer CD. -zosX ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Intrepid Ibex installer does not recognize partition table on SATA drives https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278159 You received