[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-27 Thread YannUbuntu
thank you Phillip. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020446 Title: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-26 Thread YannUbuntu
Hi Phillip, yes, grub-efi was installed manually after the Ubuntu-32bit install. ** Description changed: On a 64bits EFI computer (with GPT disk) with pre-installed 64bits Windows7. Laptop ASUS N76VZ-V2G-T1002V. - 1) Installed Ubuntu 12.04 32bits in dual-boot. Result: -

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-26 Thread Phillip Susi
A 64 bit UEFI firmware generally will only load a 64 bit boot loader. This is a limitation of the firmware, not grub. If you want to run a 32 bit OS on a 64 bit UEFI system, you have to switch it to legacy mode. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-26 Thread YannUbuntu
ok, thank you. That's another reason to make Ubiquity refusing (or advising not) to install Ubuntu-32bit on a 64-bit UEFI computer... ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020446 Title:

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-26 Thread YannUbuntu
Phillip, please could you provide sources/links showing that 64 bit UEFI firmware generally will only load a 64 bit boot loader, by firmware limitation ? or if this is just personal experience, please could you indicate which firmware/computers you have seen with this limitation ? -- You

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-26 Thread Phillip Susi
I actually came across a blog entry by Matthew Garret ( redhat kernel guru ) today pleading to hardware vendors not to release 32 bit uefi only systems where he states the same thing: http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/26734.html I looked over the UEFI specs a bit today too and came to the conclusion

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-25 Thread YannUbuntu
Jonathan, This bug is about 64-bit computers, so it is not duplicate of Ubuntu i386 images are not compatible with 32-bit UEFI computers.. Concerning your remark, are you saying that you have a grubia32.efi entry allowing to boot Ubuntu on a 64-bit computer? If yes, please could you indicate

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-25 Thread Phillip Susi
As stated this doesn't make sense. As the other bugs note, the 32 bit cd can't boot in efi mode and can't install grub-efi. Did you manually install grub-efi? Unless you did something like that, then the installer would have put grub-pc on the system. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-09-24 Thread Jonathan
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102 Mounting the EFI partition as /boot/efi (fat32 filesystem) and maunally installing grub-efi (through chroot) makes a valid entry in the EFI partition. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2013-03-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102 Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1020446] Re: grub-efi 32 bits fails on 64bits computer

2012-09-13 Thread YannUbuntu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 102 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102 Another case: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2056626 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 102 Ubuntu32bits is incompatible with EFI computers -- You received this bug