The 18 month support period for Gutsy Gibbon 7.10 has reached its end of life -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-7.10-eol . As a result, we are closing the
Gutsy task.
--
dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102105
You received this bug notific
The 18 month support period for Gutsy Gibbon 7.10 has reached its end of life -
http://www.ubuntu.com/news/ubuntu-7.10-eol . As a result, we are closing the
Gutsy task.
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Status: Conf
sorry for the inconvenience, it is already done. :op
--
dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102105
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
It will very convenient to have the /etc/profile.d working like this.
I need this to adjust properly proxy settings in different networks
environments.
Will this commited for hardy ?
Thanks !
--
dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102105
You
addressed in base-files_4.0.1ubuntu2 and dash_0.5.4-6ubuntu1
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
I wasted a long while before discovering that Ubuntu was not LSB
compliant and this bug was the source of my broken scripts. How can this
only be set to low?
--
dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102105
You received this bug notification becau
Matthias, your "so this option is not required" claim doesn't match a
plain English reading of the text. Please fix the two reported bugs;
both are equally important and shouldn't be ignored.
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu Gutsy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose
--
dash does not confor
Well, now, those are two entirely separate assertions. This particular
LSB violation is hardly common practice.
What you really mean by "common practice" is GNU bashisms, which is a
separate issue, and frankly, has already been talked to death (and, at
the least, does not belong here).
--
dash d
This issue _is_ important ! The default /bin/sh does not conform to LSB
standards, and does not conform to common practice. This cause quite a
few scripts fail, one of them being nautilus-open-terminal.
--
dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10
I don't think the LSB applies to bash in Ubuntu, since it only
standardizes /bin/sh (which on Ubuntu is dash, not bash). I would
appreciate confirmation from LSB folk about this (setting to Needs
Info).
** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Needs Info
--
dash does not confo
Dissociating from the lsb package; I don't think this has anything to do
with the lsb package itself, only with compliance with the LSB
specification (which is a different matter)
** Changed in: lsb (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Rejected
--
dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/
Confirmed for dash
** Summary changed:
- Issues of Ubuntu's LSB compliance - Login shell startup
+ dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
** Changed in: dash (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
dash does not conform to LSB (-l option, /etc/profile.d)
https://b
12 matches
Mail list logo
