Because I thought it could help other people. Sorry I wasted your
precious time, Alexander. But I hear you, the next time I see what could
be a bug in Ubuntu's default compiling settings I'll just get a
workaround for me.
--
Vanilla Firefox 2.0.0.3 doesn't compile on Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad
Though you found a solution, why did you think that its a good idea to
post a firefox bug in the first place against the ubuntu package? Please
don't do so in the future, but go straight to mozillas bugzilla.
--
Vanilla Firefox 2.0.0.3 doesn't compile on Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102
Thank you!
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 17:53 +, Todd wrote:
> Disable hidden visibility and recompile:
> http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2005-10-27/gcc-40-workaround/
>
--
Vanilla Firefox 2.0.0.3 doesn't compile on Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102518
You received this bug notification
Disable hidden visibility and recompile:
http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2005-10-27/gcc-40-workaround/
--
Vanilla Firefox 2.0.0.3 doesn't compile on Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102518
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
Well, this isn't actually a bug, since thats why there are specialized
packages for Ubuntu... but the issue here is your trying to compile a
static build, but your referencing some system libs (possibly even
libxpcom) which aren't static, or something of the like. Below is a link
to the total diff
