[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-11 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Override component to main auditd 1:2.2.2-1ubuntu3 in raring amd64: universe/admin/extra -> main auditd 1:2.2.2-1ubuntu3 in raring armhf: universe/admin/extra -> main auditd 1:2.2.2-1ubuntu3 in raring i386: universe/admin/extra -> main auditd 1:2.2.2-1ubuntu3 in raring powerpc: universe/admin/extra

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-11 Thread Jamie Strandboge
> Thanks Tyler :) I added auditd as an on-demand supported install. (to the raring supported seed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026852 Title: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude) To

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-11 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Thanks Tyler :) I added auditd as an on-demand supported install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026852 Title: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude) To manage notifications about this b

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-09 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package audit - 1:2.2.2-1ubuntu3 --- audit (1:2.2.2-1ubuntu3) raring; urgency=low * Fix important build warnings (LP: #1026852) - debian/patches/fix-asprintf-warnings.patch: Linux asprintf() implementations do not provide guarantees around the str

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-08 Thread Tyler Hicks
Here's the (large) debdiff that fixes the important compiler warnings. I've submitted all three patches upstream: https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2013-February/msg3.html There are still remaining compiler warnings, but I consider them to be ok: ../../../../src/libev/ev.c:1254:31:

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-08 Thread Adam Conrad
If we want auditd in main, someone will have to decide where it should be seeded, for now, this will just pull in libaudit-dev and libaudit1, as build-deps of glibc, linux, etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-08 Thread Adam Conrad
Alright, based on the above comments by Jamie, and the knowledge that Tyler will have packages fixing the warnings for me this weekend, I'm going to pre-promote the lot so nscd can build against it. ** Changed in: libprelude (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received t

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-07 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Audit MIR: * Builds fine pulling in only libprelude from universe * Has a test suire and it is enabled * Uses dh_python2 but not reverse depends on python-audit that are on the CD * There is an Ubuntu delta, but Tyler is pushing this to Debian. A small delta may remain to disable the network

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-07 Thread Jamie Strandboge
MIR review for libprelude: * Builds fine with only main enabled * Has a test suite and it is enabled in the build * No Ubuntu delta * dh_makeshlibs is used, but not dh_makeshlibs -V (would be nice to have this in Debian) * Has debian/watch file * Update history is slow, but there isn't reall

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-07 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: audit (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) ** Changed in: libprelude (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. htt

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-07 Thread Tyler Hicks
** Changed in: audit (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026852 Title: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude) To manage notifications about this bu

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package audit - 1:2.2.2-1ubuntu2 --- audit (1:2.2.2-1ubuntu2) raring; urgency=low * Disable auditd network listener with --disable-listener (LP: #1026852) - debian/rules: Reduce the risk of a remote attack on auditd, which runs as root, by not bui

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-06 Thread Tyler Hicks
** No longer affects: libev (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026852 Title: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-06 Thread Tyler Hicks
Ok, the MIR description has been updated to reflect changes that have occurred since I originally opened this MIR request and I've re- subscribed ubuntu-mir. ** Description changed: This is a MIR to bring a portion of binary packages built from the audit source package into main. The binary

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-06 Thread Tyler Hicks
** Description changed: This is a MIR to bring a portion of binary packages built from the audit source package into main. The binary packages of interest (some of which are created by the attached debdiff for the audit package) are: -  - auditd-common - - auditd-light -  - libaudit0 +  - a

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-06 Thread Marc Deslauriers
ACK on the debdiff. Uploaded, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026852 Title: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-06 Thread Tyler Hicks
After speaking with infinity, mdeslaur, and jdstrand, we've decided to *not* split the audit package into an audit daemon with networking support and another without. Instead, we've decided to disable network listener support in the existing auditd binary package. If we have a large number of user

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2013-02-06 Thread Tim Gardner
linux-tools perf depends on libaudit-dev. I've disabled building perf until such time as libaudit-dev is promoted to main. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026852 Title: [MIR] audit (p

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2012-12-12 Thread Laurent Bigonville
FYI I've just uploaded 1:2.2.2-1 in debian experimental -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026852 Title: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2012-12-05 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors for now, since debdiff should get rebased on 2.2 branch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1026852 Title: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude) To manage notif

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2012-12-01 Thread Laurent Bigonville
I would suggest you to consider updating to 2.2 branch before doing the MIR 2.2 (from debian) has added some new packages and libaudit got a soname bump -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude)

2012-11-26 Thread Ubuntu Foundations Team Bug Bot
The attachment "audit_1.7.18-1ubuntu2.debdiff" of this bug report has been identified as being a patch in the form of a debdiff. The ubuntu- sponsors team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can review and hopefully sponsor the debdiff. In the event that this is in fact not a patch

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-11-26 Thread Tyler Hicks
Here's a debdiff which backports the upstream patches that disable the auditd network listener and splits up the auditd package into auditd- common, auditd, and auditd-light. I've tested the resulting packages and everything looks good except for these dpkg warnings when doing a dist- upgrade to th

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-10-26 Thread Adam Conrad
Worth noting that nscd (from the glibc build) can also take advantage of libaudit if it can link to it at runtime. nscd on its own isn't much of a reason to promote libaudit, but it would be lovely if someone pokes me to re-enable the build-dep if/when libaudit is deemed uncrackful enough to promo

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-08-03 Thread Tyler Hicks
My patches to disable the auditd listener code at build time have been sent to the linux-audit list and the thread is archived here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2012-August/msg7.html They are pending review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-07-20 Thread Tyler Hicks
After speaking with jdstrand, I'm going to explore the option of disabling the auditd code that listens on the network. Then we may be able to simply support the non-networked auditd and leave all networking capabilities in universe. Unsubscribing ubuntu-mir and marking the libprelude and libev ta

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-07-19 Thread Tyler Hicks
As Steve Langasek has previously pointed out[1], the audit source tree includes an embedded copy[2] of libev that is statically links against. If we leave it as-is, we can drop the libev build dependency but that doesn't seem like a clean solution. 1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron