[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-11-26 Thread Tyler Hicks
Here's a debdiff which backports the upstream patches that disable the auditd network listener and splits up the auditd package into auditd- common, auditd, and auditd-light. I've tested the resulting packages and everything looks good except for these dpkg warnings when doing a dist- upgrade to th

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-10-26 Thread Adam Conrad
Worth noting that nscd (from the glibc build) can also take advantage of libaudit if it can link to it at runtime. nscd on its own isn't much of a reason to promote libaudit, but it would be lovely if someone pokes me to re-enable the build-dep if/when libaudit is deemed uncrackful enough to promo

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-08-03 Thread Tyler Hicks
My patches to disable the auditd listener code at build time have been sent to the linux-audit list and the thread is archived here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-audit/2012-August/msg7.html They are pending review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of U

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-07-20 Thread Tyler Hicks
After speaking with jdstrand, I'm going to explore the option of disabling the auditd code that listens on the network. Then we may be able to simply support the non-networked auditd and leave all networking capabilities in universe. Unsubscribing ubuntu-mir and marking the libprelude and libev ta

[Bug 1026852] Re: [MIR] audit (pulls in libprelude and maybe libev)

2012-07-19 Thread Tyler Hicks
As Steve Langasek has previously pointed out[1], the audit source tree includes an embedded copy[2] of libev that is statically links against. If we leave it as-is, we can drop the libev build dependency but that doesn't seem like a clean solution. 1: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cron