[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

Fixed in 2.13.1~rc2-1ubuntu1 ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ralph Janke (txwikinger) = LaMont Jones (lamont) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103680 You received

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

** Changed in: util-linux (Debian) Status: New = Fix Released -- [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low -- [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

Waiting for upstream response -- [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

Txwikinger is right in its explanations of my intentions for this bug report, it is for consistency with all others usages of hwclock command in the script (I'm sorry, I should have explain that in my report). It's not critical, and again less critical in this case because the flag is --adjust

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

** Changed in: util-linux (Debian) Status: Unknown = Unconfirmed -- [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 12:04:21AM -, txwikinger wrote: I think it was filed about the inconsitency in the call of hwclock. Throughout the script it is /sbin/hwclock however, in that commented instance it is just hwclock. - #hwclock --adjust $GMT $BADYEAR + #/sbin/hwclock --adjust $GMT

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

Confirmed in feisty ** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = txwikinger Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103680 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #418107 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418107 ** Also affects: util-linux (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418107 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [hwclock] full path for a command

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

Why do you feel this is a problem? The only error I see is the typo in the earlier comment (enablig) -- [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 103680] Re: [hwclock] full path for a command possibly uncommented in init script

I think it was filed about the inconsitency in the call of hwclock. Throughout the script it is /sbin/hwclock however, in that commented instance it is just hwclock. - #hwclock --adjust $GMT $BADYEAR + #/sbin/hwclock --adjust $GMT $BADYEAR I guess it is just cosmetic and nothing of real