Re: [Bug 1036965] Re: Apport reports to errors.ubuntu.com, not Launchpad bugs

2012-10-03 Thread Martin Pitt
quequotion [2012-10-03 10:52 -]: > I don't think users of either are aware of this. I only noticed the > inconsistency since upgrading to 12.04, but I tend to upgrade to every > new release. (I am considering sticking with the LTS this time however.) For users of stable releases only, the visi

[Bug 1036965] Re: Apport reports to errors.ubuntu.com, not Launchpad bugs

2012-10-03 Thread quequotion
First, thank you for your reply and thank you for taking my issue seriously. Your reply makes me very hopeful. >quequotion [2012-09-05 19:34 -]: >> I'm actually happier with "Won't Fix" than "Invalid". >*shrug* fine for me :-) Changed. Because it more accurately explains why no action will

Re: [Bug 1036965] Re: Apport reports to errors.ubuntu.com, not Launchpad bugs

2012-09-05 Thread Martin Pitt
status wontfix quequotion [2012-09-05 19:34 -]: > I'm actually happier with "Won't Fix" than "Invalid". *shrug* fine for me :-) Changed. > In my opinion, "Report the problem..." should not just +1 a statistic, It doesn't; it sends the full data, including stack traces, log files, etc. But a

[Bug 1036965] Re: Apport reports to errors.ubuntu.com, not Launchpad bugs

2012-09-05 Thread quequotion
I'm actually happier with "Won't Fix" than "Invalid". I'd be even more happy with "Wishlist". I suppose what I want has become a feature request, but it also used to be the default behavior of apport. In my opinion, "Report the problem..." should not just +1 a statistic, especially in the case t