Dell has decided that it is not worth the risk of regressions in
proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1040833
Title:
Upgrade biosdevname to 4.1 in precise
To manage notifications
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: oem-priority/precise
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: biosdevname (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: dell-poweredge
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You rec
I've talked with Steve Langasek and Adam Conrad about this. Given our
standing SRU and regression testing policy, it would be easier to
cherry-pick the fixes that are absolutely necessary and keep the version
number the same than it is to rebase. This is effectively choice #2 in
comment #10. Hopef
and as a pastebin for better formatting http://paste.ubuntu.com/5629287/
** Changed in: oem-priority/precise
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Hi Brian,
I'm posting a diff stat of the changes. Dell is the primary consumer of
this package and they're the ones asking for the upgrade. Are there few
enough changes that we can do this in an SRU?
ChangeLog |4 ++
biosdevname.1 |4 +-
biosdevname.spec.fed
** Summary changed:
- Pull in upstream biosdevname patches for 12.04
+ Upgrade biosdevname to 4.1 in precise
** Changed in: biosdevname (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Brian Murray (brian-murray)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
