Changelogs for the relevant packages (spice, spice-protocol, and
xserver-xorg-video-qxl) from current quantal versions to the proposed
new versions.
** Attachment added: p
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-qxl/+bug/1056381/+attachment/3368270/+files/p
--
You
spice-protocol:
Major changes in 0.12.2
===
* Add A8 surface capability in display channel.
* Add to qxl device support for:
* client present
* client capabilities
* client monitors configuration
Major changes in 0.12.1
===
* Support seamless migration.
xserver-xorg-video-qxl:
commit 6520293e1e1f57bafbcf99592e766f810ce3ad2d
Author: Søren Sandmann Pedersen s...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Sep 20 16:26:36 2012 -0400
Make the checks for composite and a8 return FALSE for Xspice
They depend on the PCI revision which is not available for
spice:
Major changes in 0.12.0:
* Stable Release
* support setting client monitor configuration via device
QXLInterface::client_monitors_config
* support notifying guest of client capabilities
QXLInterface::set_client_capabilities
* new capability for A8 Surface support
This bug was fixed in the package spice - 0.12.0-0ubuntu1
---
spice (0.12.0-0ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low
* New upstream release 0.12.0. (LP: #1056381)
-- Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:48:21 -0500
** Changed in: spice (Ubuntu)
Status:
This bug was fixed in the package spice-protocol - 0.12.2-0ubuntu1
---
spice-protocol (0.12.2-0ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (LP: #1056381)
-- Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@ubuntu.com Tue, 02 Oct 2012 15:47:41 -0500
--
You received this bug notification
This bug was fixed in the package xserver-xorg-video-qxl -
0.1.0-0ubuntu1
---
xserver-xorg-video-qxl (0.1.0-0ubuntu1) quantal; urgency=low
* Merge from unreleased debian git. (LP: #1056381)
xserver-xorg-video-qxl (0.1.0-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
[ Maarten Lankhorst ]
* New
I've granted a FFE on this. I've reviewed the code changes in all the
packages, and is fairly low and the current amount of breakage is quite
high. In review of the code, given the vast majority of code merely
adds new enums and structs I believe risk of regression is acceptable.
Packages
