[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-12-03 Thread Scott Moser
it would seem that mountall is likely the difference between pretty green dots at [1] (ubuntu-quantal-daily-i386-server-20121125) and the evil red dots at [2] (ubuntu-quantal-daily-i386-server-20121128) . The difference in manifests of those 2 builds are http://paste.ubuntu.com/1408166/ . The

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-11-26 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mountall - 2.42ubuntu0.1 --- mountall (2.42ubuntu0.1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low * Fix a regression introduced in 2.41: parse_mountinfo() doesn't generate a mounted event for a filesystem whose canonicalized mountpoint doesn't match the

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-11-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Marking as verified per the feedback in duplicate bug #1081559. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059471 Title:

Re: [Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-11-15 Thread Iain Lane
Hey, On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:57:47AM -, Clint Byrum wrote: Hello Iain, or anyone else affected, Accepted mountall into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/2.42ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-11-14 Thread Clint Byrum
Hello Iain, or anyone else affected, Accepted mountall into quantal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/2.42ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-11-07 Thread Steve Langasek
** Description changed: + [Impact] + A change introduced in mountall in quantal can cause boot-time hangs for some users when a filesystem is listed in /etc/fstab with a non-canonicalized mount point. This is a regression vs. previous releases. + + [Test case] + 1. Create a directory,

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-11-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/mountall -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059471 Title: 2.41 fails to mount root partition To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-11-06 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059471 Title: 2.41 fails to mount root partition To manage notifications

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-11-06 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package mountall - 2.43 --- mountall (2.43) unstable; urgency=low * Fix a regression introduced in 2.41: parse_mountinfo() doesn't generate a mounted event for a filesystem whose canonicalized mountpoint doesn't match the mountpoint specified in

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-10-10 Thread Steve Langasek
** Tags added: rls-q-notfixing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059471 Title: 2.41 fails to mount root partition To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-10-08 Thread Brian Murray
** Tags removed: rls-q-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1059471 Title: 2.41 fails to mount root partition To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-10-03 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Steve Langasek (vorlon) ** Also affects: mountall (Ubuntu Quantal) Importance: High

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-10-02 Thread Steve Langasek
Please attach the output of mountall --verbose. You will probably need to edit /etc/init/mountall.conf and redirect the output to somewhere on /run. ** Changed in: mountall (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-10-02 Thread Iain Lane
Sure, here it is: ** Attachment added: mountall.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1059471/+attachment/3364186/+files/mountall.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-10-02 Thread Iain Lane
For fun, here's one from this successful boot after I downgraded to 2.40 again. ** Attachment added: mountall.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1059471/+attachment/3364187/+files/mountall.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-10-02 Thread Iain Lane
More investigation (paste from #ubuntu-devel) 02/10 17:58:05 Laney slangasek: so commenting out those entries [/var/lib/schroot/.. and /cgroup] indeed made it boot with 2.41 02/10 17:59:04 Laney turns out /var/lib/schroot is a symlink to /media/debian/var/lib/schroot/ 02/10 18:01:49 Laney and

[Bug 1059471] Re: 2.41 fails to mount root partition

2012-10-01 Thread Iain Lane
** Summary changed: - 3.41 fails to mount root partition + 2.41 fails to mount root partition ** Description changed: - When booting with 3.41, I get a message + When booting with 2.41, I get a message - The disk drive for / is not ready yet or not present +   The disk drive for / is not