I'm guessing we won't fix this for precise eglibc either since it can be
worked around in Wine and there are no other apparent symptoms.
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Not going to fix for wine1.4 backports, though I may backport wine1.6.
** Changed in: wine1.4 (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: wine1.4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Won't Fix
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
That patch isn't in wine1.4 yet, only wine1.5, so it needs to stay for a
bit. Maybe it can be put in wine1.4.2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Title:
bits/in.h does not inclu
Yes, you should actually be able to remove it completely since Maarten
Lankhorst checked in a commit to define it if it's not found:
(7ce6a2dfd434d8c61d5bd1525a555c19706ac5a2).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
Can I remove the cflag from the Raring wine package then? (but add it to
the quantal/precise one)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Title:
bits/in.h does not include IP_UNICAST_
Oh, so I just realized that this option _is_ available on Quantal. So,
it doesn't make sense to backport it to Precise, but it might make sense
to make it available on Quantal.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://b
No, this feature is only supported by kernels 3.4rc1+, so there's no
good reason to backport the advertising of this option. Thanks Adam!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Title:
This is fixed in glibc 2.16 and beyond. Is there any compelling reason
we really need this backported to precise?
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Raring)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Package changed: glibc (Ubuntu Precise) => eglibc (Ubuntu Precise)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Title:
bits/in.h does not include IP_UNICAST_IF from linux/in.h
To manage
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Titl
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Titl
This bug was fixed in the package wine1.4 - 1.4.1-0ubuntu2
---
wine1.4 (1.4.1-0ubuntu2) raring; urgency=low
* Drop wine1.4-common package and use :any depends for multiarch
* Remove recommends on gettext (LP: #954029)
* Add CFLAGS="-DIP_UNICAST_IF=50" to configure (LP: #1065640)
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/raring/wine1.4/raring-
proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Title:
bits/in.h does not include IP_UNICAST_IF from linux/in.h
To
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu Quantal)
Awesome, thanks so much. Do you think there's an appropriate upstream
location to report this issue? It seems that bits/in.h is rather
distro-specific, but maybe I'm wrong.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
Thanks Erich, I'll do it in configure since that is a purely build-time
packaging layer change.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Title:
bits/in.h does not include IP_UNICAST_IF
You shouldn't need to undefine IP_UNICAST_IF, since it's not in bits/in.h it
shouldn't be defined at all (linux/in.h is not included, as it has conflicts
with bits/in.h). Alternatively, you can use configure to define the flag for
you, e.g.:
CFLAGS="-DIP_UNICAST_IF=50" ./configure
--
You rece
This bug can be worked around in Wine with this patch:
http://paste.ubuntu.com/1275612/
** Also affects: wine1.4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: wine1.4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: wine1.4 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Scott
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065640
Title:
bits
19 matches
Mail list logo
