[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2014-09-30 Thread Oliver Grawert
** Changed in: ubuntu-nexus7 Assignee: Oliver Grawert (ogra) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091220 Title: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2013-11-21 Thread Ian Lantzy
This is probably a stupid question but where did you get simg2img and make_ext4fs? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091220 Title: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2013-09-19 Thread zefie
I'm not sure what the -J flag does on make_ext4fs but I've found it created a smaller rootfs.img which allowed me to flash. I have 100% failure rate using sparse, so I needed a file less than 700MB. Here was my process for my 32GB Nexus 7. simg2img raring-preinstalled-desktop-armhf+nexus7.raw tmp.

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2013-03-01 Thread Oliver Grawert
not defective but built in a special way using the android-fsutils which create a sparse filesystem that gets turned into a "kind of normal" ext4 filesystem during flashing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2013-03-01 Thread Simon Elmir
Why does the resize2fs operation fail? It the root filesystem defective in some way? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091220 Title: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2013-01-03 Thread Oliver Grawert
for the manual repackaging, you use simg2img to convert the file into a proper img, then mount the img file, copy the tarball from the mount into a temporary dir and use make_ext4fs from the package to create one using this temporary dir as input for an image of the appropriate size. -- You recei

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2013-01-03 Thread Oliver Grawert
as dimitrijs listed above, the plan as discussed at UDS was to have usb-creator do the repackaging, i would have started to work on this already but had to burn my annual vacation days ;) work on this will start soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2012-12-25 Thread Francesco Mateotti
How eaxactly would one go about using android-tools-fsutils to resize the image? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091220 Title: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/3

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2012-12-20 Thread Robert Bruce Park
If we published images in all three sizes, would the larger sizes just be zero-filled to make up the space? that would be quite compressible, wouldn't it? Seems you could just have 16gb.iso.gz that would be not much larger than 8gb.iso. -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2012-12-20 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
There are multiple nexus7 sizes, but the generate image contains pre- formatted fixed size filesystem (as required to flash it using android tools). The problem is that we don't want to generate 3 images (expensive buildtime, download size, qa efforts). On the other hand we do want to maximize an

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2012-12-20 Thread Robert Bruce Park
** Changed in: ubuntu-nexus7 Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091220 Title: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants To man

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2012-12-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: ubuntu-nexus7-installer (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091

[Bug 1091220] Re: Document resizing and/or rebuilding 8GB image for 16GB/32GB variants

2012-12-17 Thread Till Kamppeter
It would be also great if the ubuntu-nexus7-installer rebuilds the image for the actual storage capacity of the target Nexus 7. ** Also affects: ubuntu-nexus7-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ubuntu-nexus7-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided =>