[Bug 1094789] Re: Pulseaudio Profile

2014-10-08 Thread Jamie Strandboge
We won't be adding new profiles to the apparmor-profiles package but instead profiles should be added to the pusleaudio package, please consider filing a new bug against pulseaudio. Thanks ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notific

[Bug 1094789] Re: Pulseaudio Profile

2013-03-15 Thread Colin O'Brien
His is cleaner, and would work on more systems since he uses abstractions. If Pulseaudio isn't setUID then it should be fine, since being so tight shouldn't be necessary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1094789] Re: Pulseaudio Profile

2013-03-15 Thread Simon Déziel
@Colin, Steve Beattie have included a working profile for Pulseaudio: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/apparmor- profiles/master/view/head:/ubuntu/13.04/usr.bin.pulseaudio I'm running Steve's profile on my Precise laptop and it works very well. ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Sta

[Bug 1094789] Re: Pulseaudio Profile

2013-03-15 Thread Colin O'Brien
I see it's changed to expired. If it would help move things along, I can rewrite this profile with /base and remove redundant entries. At that point anyone willing to simply test it can do so, but it should simply work. I'm still unsure about the capabilities, as is *requested* those capabilities

[Bug 1094789] Re: Pulseaudio Profile

2013-03-13 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for apparmor (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094

[Bug 1094789] Re: Pulseaudio Profile

2013-01-12 Thread Colin O'Brien
It also requires the setuid permission. I thought that it dropped its privileges? Because it, apparently, needs quite a number of capabilities, including setuid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.ne

[Bug 1094789] Re: Pulseaudio Profile

2013-01-12 Thread Colin O'Brien
I hadn't realized that pulseaudio was no longer setuid, I'm just out of date I suppose haha. If it's not setuid there's less of a need for such strict rules, and using an abstraction may be ok. But wouldn't it simply be enough to use: @{multiarch} ? I apologize for taking so long to reply. If /b

[Bug 1094789] Re: Pulseaudio Profile

2013-01-08 Thread Steve Beattie
Hi Colin, I'm a little confused, while confining pulseaudio is a good idea, pulseaudio should no longer be setuid, and hasn't been by default in Ubuntu since at least before 10.04 LTS. The reason it was setuid in the past was to give itself realtime priority (which requires CAP_SYS_NICE, see capab