[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2009-01-27 Thread Michele Mangili
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments. Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report you can click on

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2008-08-28 Thread Leann Ogasawara
The Ubuntu Kernel Team is planning to move to the 2.6.27 kernel for the upcoming Intrepid Ibex 8.10 release. As a result, the kernel team would appreciate it if you could please test this newer 2.6.27 Ubuntu kernel. There are one of two ways you should be able to test: 1) If you are comfortable

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-09-24 Thread alyandon
It's hard to say for sure. :-/ My problem hasn't resurfaced since I replaced the faulty memory module. Considering how few people have actually reported this particular problem and the fact that my problem appears to have gone away (not a single peep in /var/log/kern*) my gut instinct tells me

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-09-05 Thread SrdjanTodorovic
I ran memtest86 and had no errors. Seems for some people this is bad RAM and for others a real kernel bug? -- kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-08-15 Thread alyandon
On a hunch, I took the machine down and ran memtest86 which revealed a faulty memory module. Please ignore my report. -- kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-08-06 Thread alyandon
I am experiencing the same issue with both 2.6.20-15 -16. I seem to recall the problematic behavior starting sometime around the last point release to the vmware package. I initially suspected a problem with vmware and removed it from my system but the problem still persists. Relevant dmesg

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-07-05 Thread Rui Bernardo
I was playing scorched3d and the game vanished. When I looked at my logs I found the error kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588! invalid opcode: [1] SMP but the modules linked to this errors seed more dangerous: [37749.582282] Modules linked in: nf_conntrack_netlink ipt_MASQUERADE xt_pkttype

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-06-28 Thread SrdjanTodorovic
Crash again. on: Linux version 2.6.20-16-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)) #2 SMP Th u Jun 7 20:19:32 UTC 2007 (Ubuntu 2.6.20-16.29-generic) ** Attachment added: kernelcrash2.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8222131/kernelcrash2.txt -- kernel crash

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-06-28 Thread SrdjanTodorovic
And earlier on May 31. ** Attachment added: kernelcrash3.txt# http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8222134/kernelcrash3.txt%23 -- kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-06-13 Thread SrdjanTodorovic
I have this problem on Kubuntu 7.04 Linux version 2.6.20-15-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2 (Ubuntu 4.1.2-0ubuntu4)) #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 (Ubuntu 2.6.20-15.27-generic) I read about Eeek! page_mapcount(page) went negative! (-1). Possible bug is:

[Bug 111131] Re: kernel crash [kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:588!]

2007-06-04 Thread Kees Cook
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you