[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2013-11-01 Thread Jörg Frings-Fürst
Service Unavailable change status to invalid ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263 Title: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2011-08-11 Thread Paul Gevers
The bug in Debian was closed, but NOT fixed. It was a mere clean-up of old WNPP RFP bugs. ** Changed in: debian Importance: Unknown = Undecided ** Changed in: debian Status: Fix Released = New ** Changed in: debian Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #481606 = None ** Changed in:

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2011-08-10 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: debian Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263 Title: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes To manage notifications about

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2009-03-12 Thread Dominik Stadler
Isn't Bug 337828 a duplicate of this one? Or is this talking about a different thing? -- [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-09-15 Thread Paul Gevers
I attached my efforts up to now. Mind you, I was working on Debian at the time. Up to now I have figured out that quite some libraries were available already in Debian and don't need to be natively available. When somebody else wants to pick up the challenge, I guess a good start is what I did up

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-09-08 Thread Paul Gevers
As already discussed in this bug, implementing MPM in a clean way is not trivial. Also the library issue is not an easy point. Furthermore Tex Live (will) includes a package manager in the upcoming release if possible in Ubuntu/Debian, taking away some of the need for this package. I will upload

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-08-21 Thread Brian Murray
** Also affects: debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481606 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags added: auto-search -- [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-08-21 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: debian Status: Unknown = New -- [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-08-10 Thread Paul Gevers
Apart from the library problem (I have been able to use several system libraries, but not all libraries needed are available or the source has been edited), there are several issues with a LaTeX package manager. Please see the discussion at the Debian bug manager [1]. It was also pointed out that

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-06-02 Thread Tobias Wolf
Will you get rid of the duplication of libraries in the tarball and make it uses system libraries? $ l -1 /usr/local/lib/*MiK*.1 /usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-app.so.1@ /usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-bzip2.so.1@ /usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-core.so.1@ /usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-expat.so.1@

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-06-02 Thread Paul Gevers
I am trying to contact upstream and I also discussed on the libraries issue on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail-list (http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/05/msg00508.html). I am at the moment a little bit lost on how to proceed. If I want to make this package work with Debian/Ubuntu native

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-05-13 Thread Paul Gevers
Yesterday I was a little bit pessimistic. However, I made good progress. I think I tackled the binary/library part. I must still look into the legal stuff and some documentation (how to convert the authors documents in xml style to Debian/Ubuntu stuff), then it should be ready for some sponsor to

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-05-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Well, already I have come a long way, but MiKTeX-tools is definitely not a clever choice to start as a Debian/Ubuntu package maintainer. Although I am not a programmer, I have the feeling it is well organized and is a real contribution to Debian/Ubuntu. The biggest problem at the moment: The

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2008-04-19 Thread Paul Gevers
I will take this up as my first contribution to the Debian/Ubuntu world and try to make a package. Don't expect it tomorrow :) ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Paul Gevers (paul-climbing) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

[Bug 111263] Re: [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes

2007-06-13 Thread Daniel Holbach
** Summary changed: - MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes + [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes ** Changed in: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided = Wishlist Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263 You