Isn't Bug 337828 a duplicate of this one? Or is this talking about a
different thing?
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Apart from the library problem (I have been able to use several system
libraries, but not all libraries needed are available or the source has
been edited), there are several issues with a LaTeX package manager.
Please see the discussion at the Debian bug manager [1]. It was also
pointed out that T
** Summary changed:
- MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
+ [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You rec
I will take this up as my first contribution to the Debian/Ubuntu world
and try to make a package. Don't expect it tomorrow :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Gevers (paul-climbing)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alike
Will you get rid of the duplication of libraries in the tarball and make
it uses system libraries?
$ l -1 /usr/local/lib/*MiK*.1
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-app.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-bzip2.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-core.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-expat.so.1@
/usr/local/l
I am trying to contact upstream and I also discussed on the libraries
issue on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail-list
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/05/msg00508.html). I am at
the moment a little bit lost on how to proceed. If I want to make this
package work with Debian/Ubuntu native librar
Well, already I have come a long way, but MiKTeX-tools is definitely not
a clever choice to start as a Debian/Ubuntu package maintainer. Although
I am not a programmer, I have the feeling it is well organized and is a
real contribution to Debian/Ubuntu. The biggest problem at the moment:
The sourc
Yesterday I was a little bit pessimistic. However, I made good progress.
I think I tackled the binary/library part. I must still look into the
legal stuff and some documentation (how to convert the authors documents
in xml style to Debian/Ubuntu stuff), then it should be ready for some
sponsor to h
I attached my efforts up to now. Mind you, I was working on Debian at
the time.
Up to now I have figured out that quite some libraries were available
already in Debian and don't need to be natively available. When somebody
else wants to pick up the challenge, I guess a good start is what I did
up
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481606
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags added: auto-search
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
As already discussed in this bug, implementing MPM in a clean way is not
trivial. Also the library issue is not an easy point. Furthermore Tex
Live (will) includes a package manager in the upcoming release if
possible in Ubuntu/Debian, taking away some of the need for this
package. I will upload my
Will you get rid of the duplication of libraries in the tarball and make
it uses system libraries?
$ l -1 /usr/local/lib/*MiK*.1
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-app.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-bzip2.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-core.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-expat.so.1@
/usr/local/l
I am trying to contact upstream and I also discussed on the libraries
issue on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail-list
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/05/msg00508.html). I am at
the moment a little bit lost on how to proceed. If I want to make this
package work with Debian/Ubuntu native librar
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481606
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags added: auto-search
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
As already discussed in this bug, implementing MPM in a clean way is not
trivial. Also the library issue is not an easy point. Furthermore Tex
Live (will) includes a package manager in the upcoming release if
possible in Ubuntu/Debian, taking away some of the need for this
package. I will upload my
Apart from the library problem (I have been able to use several system
libraries, but not all libraries needed are available or the source has
been edited), there are several issues with a LaTeX package manager.
Please see the discussion at the Debian bug manager [1]. It was also
pointed out that T
I will take this up as my first contribution to the Debian/Ubuntu world
and try to make a package. Don't expect it tomorrow :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Gevers (paul-climbing)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alike
I attached my efforts up to now. Mind you, I was working on Debian at
the time.
Up to now I have figured out that quite some libraries were available
already in Debian and don't need to be natively available. When somebody
else wants to pick up the challenge, I guess a good start is what I did
up
** Summary changed:
- MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
+ [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You rec
Well, already I have come a long way, but MiKTeX-tools is definitely not
a clever choice to start as a Debian/Ubuntu package maintainer. Although
I am not a programmer, I have the feeling it is well organized and is a
real contribution to Debian/Ubuntu. The biggest problem at the moment:
The sourc
Yesterday I was a little bit pessimistic. However, I made good progress.
I think I tackled the binary/library part. I must still look into the
legal stuff and some documentation (how to convert the authors documents
in xml style to Debian/Ubuntu stuff), then it should be ready for some
sponsor to h
Isn't Bug 337828 a duplicate of this one? Or is this talking about a
different thing?
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Isn't Bug 337828 a duplicate of this one? Or is this talking about a
different thing?
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
I will take this up as my first contribution to the Debian/Ubuntu world
and try to make a package. Don't expect it tomorrow :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Gevers (paul-climbing)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alike
Apart from the library problem (I have been able to use several system
libraries, but not all libraries needed are available or the source has
been edited), there are several issues with a LaTeX package manager.
Please see the discussion at the Debian bug manager [1]. It was also
pointed out that T
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481606
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags added: auto-search
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
I attached my efforts up to now. Mind you, I was working on Debian at
the time.
Up to now I have figured out that quite some libraries were available
already in Debian and don't need to be natively available. When somebody
else wants to pick up the challenge, I guess a good start is what I did
up
As already discussed in this bug, implementing MPM in a clean way is not
trivial. Also the library issue is not an easy point. Furthermore Tex
Live (will) includes a package manager in the upcoming release if
possible in Ubuntu/Debian, taking away some of the need for this
package. I will upload my
Will you get rid of the duplication of libraries in the tarball and make
it uses system libraries?
$ l -1 /usr/local/lib/*MiK*.1
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-app.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-bzip2.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-core.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-expat.so.1@
/usr/local/l
I am trying to contact upstream and I also discussed on the libraries
issue on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail-list
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/05/msg00508.html). I am at
the moment a little bit lost on how to proceed. If I want to make this
package work with Debian/Ubuntu native librar
Well, already I have come a long way, but MiKTeX-tools is definitely not
a clever choice to start as a Debian/Ubuntu package maintainer. Although
I am not a programmer, I have the feeling it is well organized and is a
real contribution to Debian/Ubuntu. The biggest problem at the moment:
The sourc
Yesterday I was a little bit pessimistic. However, I made good progress.
I think I tackled the binary/library part. I must still look into the
legal stuff and some documentation (how to convert the authors documents
in xml style to Debian/Ubuntu stuff), then it should be ready for some
sponsor to h
** Summary changed:
- MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
+ [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You rec
I attached my efforts up to now. Mind you, I was working on Debian at
the time.
Up to now I have figured out that quite some libraries were available
already in Debian and don't need to be natively available. When somebody
else wants to pick up the challenge, I guess a good start is what I did
up
I will take this up as my first contribution to the Debian/Ubuntu world
and try to make a package. Don't expect it tomorrow :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Gevers (paul-climbing)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alike
I attached my efforts up to now. Mind you, I was working on Debian at
the time.
Up to now I have figured out that quite some libraries were available
already in Debian and don't need to be natively available. When somebody
else wants to pick up the challenge, I guess a good start is what I did
up
As already discussed in this bug, implementing MPM in a clean way is not
trivial. Also the library issue is not an easy point. Furthermore Tex
Live (will) includes a package manager in the upcoming release if
possible in Ubuntu/Debian, taking away some of the need for this
package. I will upload my
Apart from the library problem (I have been able to use several system
libraries, but not all libraries needed are available or the source has
been edited), there are several issues with a LaTeX package manager.
Please see the discussion at the Debian bug manager [1]. It was also
pointed out that T
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481606
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags added: auto-search
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
** Summary changed:
- MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
+ [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You rec
Will you get rid of the duplication of libraries in the tarball and make
it uses system libraries?
$ l -1 /usr/local/lib/*MiK*.1
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-app.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-bzip2.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-core.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-expat.so.1@
/usr/local/l
I am trying to contact upstream and I also discussed on the libraries
issue on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail-list
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/05/msg00508.html). I am at
the moment a little bit lost on how to proceed. If I want to make this
package work with Debian/Ubuntu native librar
Well, already I have come a long way, but MiKTeX-tools is definitely not
a clever choice to start as a Debian/Ubuntu package maintainer. Although
I am not a programmer, I have the feeling it is well organized and is a
real contribution to Debian/Ubuntu. The biggest problem at the moment:
The sourc
Yesterday I was a little bit pessimistic. However, I made good progress.
I think I tackled the binary/library part. I must still look into the
legal stuff and some documentation (how to convert the authors documents
in xml style to Debian/Ubuntu stuff), then it should be ready for some
sponsor to h
Isn't Bug 337828 a duplicate of this one? Or is this talking about a
different thing?
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Will you get rid of the duplication of libraries in the tarball and make
it uses system libraries?
$ l -1 /usr/local/lib/*MiK*.1
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-app.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-bzip2.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-core.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-expat.so.1@
/usr/local/l
I am trying to contact upstream and I also discussed on the libraries
issue on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail-list
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/05/msg00508.html). I am at
the moment a little bit lost on how to proceed. If I want to make this
package work with Debian/Ubuntu native librar
Apart from the library problem (I have been able to use several system
libraries, but not all libraries needed are available or the source has
been edited), there are several issues with a LaTeX package manager.
Please see the discussion at the Debian bug manager [1]. It was also
pointed out that T
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481606
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags added: auto-search
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
Well, already I have come a long way, but MiKTeX-tools is definitely not
a clever choice to start as a Debian/Ubuntu package maintainer. Although
I am not a programmer, I have the feeling it is well organized and is a
real contribution to Debian/Ubuntu. The biggest problem at the moment:
The sourc
Yesterday I was a little bit pessimistic. However, I made good progress.
I think I tackled the binary/library part. I must still look into the
legal stuff and some documentation (how to convert the authors documents
in xml style to Debian/Ubuntu stuff), then it should be ready for some
sponsor to h
I will take this up as my first contribution to the Debian/Ubuntu world
and try to make a package. Don't expect it tomorrow :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Gevers (paul-climbing)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alike
** Summary changed:
- MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
+ [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You rec
As already discussed in this bug, implementing MPM in a clean way is not
trivial. Also the library issue is not an easy point. Furthermore Tex
Live (will) includes a package manager in the upcoming release if
possible in Ubuntu/Debian, taking away some of the need for this
package. I will upload my
Isn't Bug 337828 a duplicate of this one? Or is this talking about a
different thing?
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
I attached my efforts up to now. Mind you, I was working on Debian at
the time.
Up to now I have figured out that quite some libraries were available
already in Debian and don't need to be natively available. When somebody
else wants to pick up the challenge, I guess a good start is what I did
up
Apart from the library problem (I have been able to use several system
libraries, but not all libraries needed are available or the source has
been edited), there are several issues with a LaTeX package manager.
Please see the discussion at the Debian bug manager [1]. It was also
pointed out that T
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481606
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Tags added: auto-search
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you
** Changed in: debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
As already discussed in this bug, implementing MPM in a clean way is not
trivial. Also the library issue is not an easy point. Furthermore Tex
Live (will) includes a package manager in the upcoming release if
possible in Ubuntu/Debian, taking away some of the need for this
package. I will upload my
I will take this up as my first contribution to the Debian/Ubuntu world
and try to make a package. Don't expect it tomorrow :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Gevers (paul-climbing)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alike
Will you get rid of the duplication of libraries in the tarball and make
it uses system libraries?
$ l -1 /usr/local/lib/*MiK*.1
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-app.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-bzip2.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-core.so.1@
/usr/local/lib/libMiKTeX207-expat.so.1@
/usr/local/l
I am trying to contact upstream and I also discussed on the libraries
issue on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail-list
(http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/05/msg00508.html). I am at
the moment a little bit lost on how to proceed. If I want to make this
package work with Debian/Ubuntu native librar
Well, already I have come a long way, but MiKTeX-tools is definitely not
a clever choice to start as a Debian/Ubuntu package maintainer. Although
I am not a programmer, I have the feeling it is well organized and is a
real contribution to Debian/Ubuntu. The biggest problem at the moment:
The sourc
Yesterday I was a little bit pessimistic. However, I made good progress.
I think I tackled the binary/library part. I must still look into the
legal stuff and some documentation (how to convert the authors documents
in xml style to Debian/Ubuntu stuff), then it should be ready for some
sponsor to h
** Summary changed:
- MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
+ [needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You rec
Isn't Bug 337828 a duplicate of this one? Or is this talking about a
different thing?
--
[needs-packaging] MiKTeX Tools for Unix-alikes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111263
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
72 matches
Mail list logo