[Bug 111863] Re: uname -i and -p report "unknown"

2007-05-18 Thread Micah Cowan
You're welcome. And I meant to address the CentOS thing: my guess (unverified) would be that in the absence of information from the methods I described, they just copy the value of -m. As to whether or not Ubuntu should do such a thing is another matter, and I'm not prepared (nor authorized :) ) to

[Bug 111863] Re: uname -i and -p report "unknown"

2007-05-18 Thread Jeff Abbott
Michah, Thank you very much for that informative reply -- that clarifies the Ubuntu uname situation immensely. I do wonder why RHEL/CentOS (and possibly other distros) behave differently, but this isn't an appropriate discussion venue for that. I would question why Ubuntu doesn't follow suit, bu

[Bug 111863] Re: uname -i and -p report "unknown"

2007-05-17 Thread Micah Cowan
Thank you for your bug report. This behavior is according to the documentation. Under the descriptions for both "-i" and "-p", it states, "Print `unknown' if the kernel does not make this information easily available, as is the case with Linux kernels." Most of the values for options given to the

[Bug 111863] Re: uname -i and -p report "unknown"

2007-05-17 Thread Micah Cowan
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug- coreutils/2007-04/msg00095.html -- uname -i and -p report "unknown" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun