Marking as Won't Fix. The profiles are shipped as conffiles. If a user
flips a complain-mode only profile to enforce, I think the user should
be expected to understand the question when prompted for a merge. This
is the nature of packaging and the alternative is to make these config
files and most
I think this is expected behavior. If someone modifies a distro-
published profile in /etc/apparmor.d, apt should stop and ask them how
they want to handle it. How do you think this should be handled?
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info
--
Conflict in
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 09:37:57PM -, Kees Cook wrote:
I think this is expected behavior. If someone modifies a distro-
published profile in /etc/apparmor.d, apt should stop and ask them how
they want to handle it. How do you think this should be handled?
I agree with you.
I was
Yes, dealing with config file merges tends to be a bit tricky for lots
of things. This will probably feed into a larger discussion for the
server team in general. I will mark this wishlist for now.
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
Status: Needs Info =
Updating profiles is a pain and known problem. The current plans for
dealing with this are two fold. We have been working on a merge tool,
which will allow two and three way profile merging. The tool will
provide both automatic and manual merging of profiles. The other way of
dealing with this
