> Would be possible, if someone does an SRU for it (whether it still
builds and works with the feisty toolchain).
So we are actually shipping binaries that are maybe not buildable with
the corresponding toolchain. I mistakenly had thought it was based on
some self-consistency principle, and that t
Hi Tormod,
Tormod Volden [2007-06-13 16:10 -]:
> What kind of infrastructure is that :)
The building is done by pkg-create-dbgsym; that package is installed
in the buildd chroots. The fetching and archive building is done by
http://people.ubuntu.com/~pitti/bzr/ddeb-retriever/
(bzr tree; y
What kind of infrastructure is that :)
I don't totally understand this, even if the sources were the same, it
was for sure rebuilt on Feisty, wasn't it? Aren't all packages rebuilt
in each release, in a pbuilder?
Couldn't you otherwise roll a no-change rebuild (but with corresponding
-dbgsym) int
Gutsy has a debug symbol package. Feisty doesn't because it has never
been rebuilt since before the Edgy release, when dbgsyms were not
produced yet. The toolchain changed significantly in Edgy, so if we
would produce dbgsyms with the current toolchain, they would not even
match the deb in the arch
I can confirm that no xrandr debug package is available.
** Changed in: xrandr (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
please make a -dbgsym package for Feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118852
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
