[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2015-01-27 Thread Michiel Blokzijl
I just wanted to add a comment, for any others who come to this via Google. I also hit this exact same error, but it turned out not to be caused directly by the network proxy. I had just run apt-add-repository, and that had failed to import the GPG key: root@buildhost:/home/mblokzij/ws-qvpc# add-

[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2013-12-01 Thread jl451
can this message not stoped apt-get update ? I have many reps in sources.list, not only http://archive.getdeb.net Get:2 http://archive.getdeb.net oneiric-getdeb InRelease [4555 B] Ign http://ppa.launchpad.net saucy InRelease Splitting up /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/archive.getdeb.net_ubuntu_dists_

[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2013-08-01 Thread Brian Murray
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206824 Title: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODAT

[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2013-07-31 Thread David Kalnischkies
So, what do you suggest? The hint "does the network require authentication?" is already a wild guess as this can happen for temporary down servers (e.g. "Down for maintenance"), 'longtime down' servers (e.g. domain grabber got the domain), the network you are on requires you to authenticate (first

[Bug 1206824] Re: bogus network proxies might cause: Clearsigned file isn't valid, got 'NODATA' (does the network require authentication?)

2013-07-31 Thread Steve Langasek
This hotel network is particularly special; even after you authenticate to the web portal, it's blocking archive.canonical.com as "restricted" content. This contributes to the confusion, because most of the lists get downloaded without fine, then there's this cryptic message. FWIW the actual cont