*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1229611 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229611
Hello Andy,
Yes, it much more clear now, thanks for the explanation. But I got a new
question here.
For the same logic, I guess running "ubuntu-bug linux" on 12.04.2 should open a
bug against linux-lts-qua
You are meant to be able to report bugs against _binary_ package names.
ubuntu-bug linux is a convenience so we so not have to show users how to
work out what they binary linux-image-* package actually is at the time
they file the bug. In all cases we want ubuntu-bug linux to do the
right thing, a
Hello Martin,
Thanks for point that out, I filed another bug more specifically for missing
log files. (bug 1229611)
linux-lts-raring do exist on launchpad, but it's not (and can't be) installed
on a fresh installed 12.04.3 system,
therefore I'm wondering if it's normal that we cannot file a bug
You either installed 12.04.3 from scratch or opted into upgrading to the
backported raring kernel. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-
lts-raring indeed exists, so if you are running that kernel then apport
is correct in filing bug reports against that instead of "linux".
** Changed in: ap
Temporary workaround:
File a bug by ubuntu-bug linux
Change the affected project from linux-lts-raring to linux
Run apport-collect #BugNo on the system to upload attachments.
** Description changed:
- This happens to 12.04.3, if you file a bug by using apport-bug linux,
- the affected package wi
If I try to report a bug with "ubuntu-bug linux-lts-raring" on 12.04.3,
it complains about the package does not exist.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1218183
Title:
Using "apport-bug