** Changed in: eclipse (Baltix)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
Title:
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
That's bug #604390.
On 07/11/2010 05:09 PM, Michael Jones wrote:
> Are there any plans to upgrade to Eclipse 3.6? Should that be a new bug?
>
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
I added a bug for updating to Eclipse 3.6. You can vote on it to show you care:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604390
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Are there any plans to upgrade to Eclipse 3.6? Should that be a new bug?
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
** Changed in: eclipse (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c
** Changed in: eclipse (Debian)
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: eclipse (Debian)
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #432350 => None
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Am Samstag, den 10.10.2009, 22:40 + schrieb James Tait:
> Judging by the changelog for Eclipse in Ubuntu Karmic, it's about to go
> into production:
Yes, you are right. We use a current eclipse-build svn checkout to build
eclipse 3.5.1.
> I'd love to contribute a package, but frankly I wouldn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pkt wrote:
> WRT inclusion of eclipse in debian / ubuntu a promising direction is
> to utilize the eclipse-build system developed as part of the linux tools
> project upstream @ eclipse.org
>
> I think this project already has its first (alpha sort of
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
> The project plan for Eclipse 3.6 is here:
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=eclipse
>
> This is for the Eclipse platform though. Eclipse is a large place and
> there are many projects within Eclipse that have th
The project plan for Eclipse 3.6 is here:
http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=eclipse
This is for the Eclipse platform though. Eclipse is a large place and
there are many projects within Eclipse that have their own respective
plans.
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bug
I agree that it's a disappointing, but rather than play a blame game
between volunteers within Ubuntu, Debian and Eclipse upstream, I'd
rather see how we can address the problem of keeping eclipse closer in
sync with upstream.
For starters, can anyone locate an eclipse roadmap for 3.6?
--
Upgrad
@Liad:
Packaging eclipse (or a plugin like eclipse-cdt) is not easy and consumes much
time. We lack of time / manpower / skills / motivation to update eclipse-cdt,
but we do not scorn our users. Updating the eclipse-cdt package is on our todo
list, but we cannot promise, that it will be in karmi
This will probably cause me to be scorned by the developers, though I
honestly think they're doing really great job, well, for the most part,
but my humble opinion is that being unable to provide an upgraded
version of Eclipse with each new Eclipse release (and with that for each
flavor - plug-in i
gerstrong, eclipse-cdt is a separate package, there's bug 163739 for
tracking its upgrade.
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Sorry, but Eclipse CDT is at version 3.1
That's very old. It also should be upgraded, because it doesn't work
with the newest platform.
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Incomplete
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this
This bug was fixed in the package eclipse - 3.5.1-0~ubuntu1
---
eclipse (3.5.1-0~ubuntu1) karmic; urgency=low
* Fix build failure on lpia.
* For anything else kudos to the eclipse-team.
eclipse (3.5.1-0~ppa1) karmic; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (LP: #123064)
- Supp
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
Well, my packages are only tested on Jaunty. And it makes sense
Subclipse breaks on Karmik since Jaunty still uses Subversion 1.5. ;-)
Also you shouldn't mix the different eclipse repo's out there. (Like
eclipse-teams repo.) Eclipse's dependencies are pretty complicated, so
it can easily go wrong.
... one more. Sorry. Just didn't want to muck people up with prior comments.
I shouldn't have tried installing the .deb files myself it seems.
Appears that adding yogarine as a repo works just fine. However, the subclipse
package only has SVNkit which doesn't play so well with svn 1.6 (errors on
Oh. One more bit of bugspam. I'm not sure exactly what is going on w/
Yogarine's - it is definitely not the one I was using before.
eclipse depends on eclipse-platform and eclipse-jdt, but eclipse-jdt
depends on eclipse-platform-sdk which conflicts with eclipse-platform.
plus circular deps betwe
Fail. Seems to want to install in /usr/lib, and running as root (hey, whatever,
I'll install the packages globally if it wants - I'd rather it was ubuntu
packaged subclipse anyway) simply aborts with various errors like:
!MESSAGE Missing required bundle
org.eclipse.wst.common.environment_[1.0.10
Enabling classic update seems to work.
Not sure exactly what happened to my existing plugins, but, hey. looks hopeful.
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
So, I had been using the 3.4 ppa build mentioned in this bug in Jaunty
with some success.
I decided to give Karmic a shot, and after some entertainment with the
Karmic eclipse not picking up all its dependancies (had to manually add
them a few at a time, working my way down), eclipse was installed
Since some days we (Niels Thykier, Adrian Perez, and I) work on getting
an eclipse 3.5 build for Debian/Ubuntu based on the Linux Tools. You can
grab the current status from the git repository [1]. Helping hands are
welcome (especially ant hackers and FHS experts). You can find us in the
#eclipse-l
The Eclipse linuxtools project has just released version 0.3.0, which
includes an eclipse-builder component that standardises Eclipse builds
across Linux distros. This currently works with 3.5.x, I don't know
about 3.4.x, but it might be a way to get to 3.5.x quickly. From the
announcement:
The
As the description states 3.5.0 is out and SHOULD be tested in karmic to
make it run great in the next LTS release. Ubuntu already is the distro
of choice for most developers. It is sad that they have to get Eclipse
from somewhere else than the Ubuntu repos. So I vote for exchanging 3.4
with 3.5 in
A quick comment from doko after he uploaded:
I'm filing a bug report to remove this package again, because it does
include a handful or more third party libs inside the eclipse package. if you
want to keep eclipse, please fix these bugs, hint, hint ;)
Basically, where possible, it's preferred t
Shouldn't it depend directly on xulrunner, then? Or does it require
something from the firefox package?
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:57 PM, aporter wrote:
> Yes thanks very much for eclipse 3.4 in karmic.
>
> I have to ask, why does the "eclipse-platform" package depend on the
> "firefox" package?
Eclipse uses a particular version of xulrunner for various functions
e.g., to display the welcome page.
-
Yes thanks very much for eclipse 3.4 in karmic.
I have to ask, why does the "eclipse-platform" package depend on the
"firefox" package?
Shouldn't it just depend on the "www-browser" virtual package or is
there something in firefox that it needs? If it's the latter, then the
firefox-3.5 package s
Yeah, Eclipse 3.4.1 finally arrived in Karmic! Thanks to anyone who made
this possible!
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
In a previous comment
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/123064/comments/184),
I mentioned the Ubuntu team talking to the Eclipse linux community for
help.
I've seen nothing yet.
If RedHat can do it... so can Ubuntu
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse
How about gettin
Remove eclipse totally is better than have a completely and totally
obsolete version. It's better both for Ubuntu project, at least they can
pretend it's a choice, and more important here for eclipse. Eclipse 3.2
is soo old that it's completely ridiculous. Eclipse project SHOULD
forbid any dist
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: eclipse
- Eclipse 3.5.0 will soon be out.
+ Eclipse 3.5.0 "Galileo" is out in time for an LTS preview in Karmic.
** Tags added: java
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because yo
That package contains eclipse 3.4.1
Matthias Klose was active here on 2009-05-26:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/123064/comments/169
At that date the description here was already asking for 3.4.2 and got
changed to 3.5.0 on 2009-06-16.
Eclipse releases at a very accurate
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> Where is the packege? I mean it's not here:
>
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=eclipse&searchon=names&suite=karmic§ion=all
>
> I think that if 3.4 was uploaded then the path is clean to have eclipse
> 3.5 or 3.5+1 in karmic+1 is
Where is the packege? I mean it's not here:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=eclipse&searchon=names&suite=karmic§ion=all
I think that if 3.4 was uploaded then the path is clean to have eclipse
3.5 or 3.5+1 in karmic+1 isn't it?
BTW I am thankful :)
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https:/
If it is any help: I think on Gentoo it is possible to compile eclipse
with openjdk (at least 3.4, did not test with 3.5, yet).
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Why not be thankful?
On 6/29/09, karl michael wrote:
> why not 3.5?
>
> --
> Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in “eclipse” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed
> Status in “e
why not 3.5?
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bu
It appears that Doko (Matthias Klose) has uploaded a 3.4 package to
Karmic.
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
Btw, some things the eclipse team could do to make packagers' lives easier
and increase the chances for an eclipse version that meets debian's high
freedom/quality standards:
* Test your code with openjdk.
* Assist with building eclipse in a headless manner from the command-line.
(this practically
The problem is that, for the most part, there is no debian/ubuntu
eclipse team.
There is mostly just individuals right now, many with almost no free time
(e.g., I don't even use eclipse nowadays).
Removing the ancient 3.2 version might help bring a few more interested
developers to assist towards
There's a Linux Distros project at Eclipse that aims to make Eclipse
easier to use on Linux.
Maybe some people from the Ubuntu team should consider joining?
Red Hat is an active participant and they have done some recent work to
help things.
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/linuxtools-dev/ms
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/eclipse
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://li
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia wrote:
> I think the request to remove eclipse from ubuntu is extremely smart. If
> eclipse will want to be in ubuntu they'll need to cooperate themselves,
> as ubuntu clearly does not have enough man power. On the other hand,
> keeping ecliplse 3.2
I think the request to remove eclipse from ubuntu is extremely smart. If
eclipse will want to be in ubuntu they'll need to cooperate themselves,
as ubuntu clearly does not have enough man power. On the other hand,
keeping ecliplse 3.2 gives a bad reputation to ubuntu.
And if there is no such packa
There are many thing eclipse could do to make packaging easier:
* Provide a source package (preferred as tar.gz) which does not contain any
compiled file (like .jar).
* One command (like running ant) to build all binary files from scratch.
* One command to cleanup the directory (delete all genera
+1 to previous comment. If this is not going to be fixed for karmic,
please remove completely in karmic. The argument appears to be about
whether to package eclipse, or to use the official eclipse installer. In
either case, leaving 3.2 is a bad idea.
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launc
I'm a frequent visitor of #eclipse on freenode irc and there is at least
one perso each day, who has a problem related to eclipse 3.2 on ubuntu.
Eclipse 3.5 will be released this week and this issue will celebrate
it's third birthday soon. Any chance that it will be adressed for the
next ubuntu re
Very inconvenient. I really hope that Karmic Koala includes Eclipse
3.5.
While the Eclipse Team PPA doesn't currently provide Jaunty amd64
packages, I was able to install the Intrepid packages successfully.
Here's my /etc/apt/sources.list.d/eclipse.sources.list:
#deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/ecl
** Summary changed:
- Upgrade to Eclipse 3.4.2
+ Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: eclipse
- Eclipse 3.4.2 is now out
+ Eclipse 3.5.0 will soon be out.
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification
52 matches
Mail list logo
