** Changed in: amanda (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Is this bug still a problem for people, because there has been little
recent activity, and the general feel I'm getting from the comments is
that this bug has been fixed?
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a
Fine by me.
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Since Ubuntu Hardy, amanda-common depends on openbsd-inetd or inet-
superserver. Is that enough to mark this bug fixed?
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Since Ubuntu Hardy, amanda-common depends on openbsd-inetd or inet-
superserver. Is that enough to mark this bug fixed?
Works for me.
One caveat, though: Amanda comes with an xinetd configuration file all
ready to go. Folks using other programs may have some editing to do (but
if you can handle
** Changed in: amanda (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Has there been any resolution on what has to be done with this bug?
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Tags added: bitesize packaging
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: amanda (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Changed in: amanda (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #450952
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450952
** Also affects: amanda (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=450952
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
amanda does not require xinetd
I would like to inform Debian maintainer too, I think he can give us advices on
how to proceed correctly.
Could you please file a new bug report in Debian about this issue and link it
to this bug? If you haven't time, I will do it in the next few days.
--
amanda does not require xinetd
amanda-common (dependency of amanda-client) 1:2.5.2p1-1 in Debian
depends on openbsd-inetd, so when you install amanda-client a inetd
server is installed too. Do you think it is enough to fix this bug?
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug
It's a bare minimum fix, and has problems. It has the minor one of
requiring inetd for the server. Most server installations will also have
clients, or other programs that will use (x)inetd, so it's no big deal.
However, I just tried to install amanda-client on a machine that had
neither
amanda-server depends on openbsd-inetd since 1:2.5.1p1-2.1ubuntu1. Is it
necessary for amanda-{client,common} too?
** Changed in: amanda (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
amanda does not require xinetd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124796
You received this bug notification because
Odd. I can't see why the server should require inetd, since it usually
runs as a cron job. A machine with the server but no client wouldn't
need inetd for Amanda (but it might for other things).
I wonder if Amanda used to be all one package, and when it was split up,
the dependency went to the
16 matches
Mail list logo
