Flock has been discontinued after Flock Inc has been acquired by Zynga.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flock_%28web_browser%29
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
Title:
[needs-packag
** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
Title:
[needs-packaging] flock
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
Marcus from Flock dev reported a few interesting points that I think bear
repeating here:
"'Sulfur' is not a code name, it is the the unbranded version you are looking
for..
"I have expended effort in removing proprietary logos, images and text
from this unbranded build, but that task is not com
Submitted to Flock, please vote up this feature request:
https://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16384
** Bug watch added: bugzilla.flock.com/ #16384
https://bugzilla.flock.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16384
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug not
Agreed with Alexander. I will refer this bug upstream to Flock, asking
them to consider a free branding edition (think IceWeasel).
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
I hope this is resolved! I'd love to see flock on Ubuntu!
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:39:36PM -, Przemysław Kulczycki wrote:
> They do. If you won't use the branding compile switch, Flock will
> compile as Sulphur (or other codename) just like Firefox will compile to
> Bon Echo, Grand Paradiso or whatever the current codename is.
>
The problem with s
They do. If you won't use the branding compile switch, Flock will
compile as Sulphur (or other codename) just like Firefox will compile to
Bon Echo, Grand Paradiso or whatever the current codename is.
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notifica
unlikely that anyone of the ubuntu-mozillateam will actively work on
this. flock developers could provide a free branding.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you
I used to maintain a packaging branch for flock 2 and to provide preview
debs in my PPA but I stopped as there are legal issues not acceptable
for Ubuntu, issues that have apparently no chance to be solved.
I just linked the branch to this bug as a reference but I don't intend
to work on it again,
Hi schnollk,
ubuntu-desktop does not deal with packaging requests. Only a MOTU would
be really able to answer, but I would guess it has not been worked on
because it has not, yet, been accepted on Debian.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop) => (unassigned)
** Tag
here is a more direct link to the deb at getdeb than the category one by
leoquant:
http://www.getdeb.net/app/Flock
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
assigning to team I think most appropriate from those I found in hope
for responce/comments
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu Desktop (ubuntu-desktop)
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a
one year without any "official" comment on why flock hasn't been added
to offic. repos. yet nor why it shouldn't. To be honest I'm
disappointed. There are even people offering packaging help if mentored!
Can anyone with Ubuntu inside knowledge comment on this, please? I'd
like to know if there has
: http://www.flock.com/node/62014 and the award for the best social
webbrowser.
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
I'd also love to see Flock added to the repos and would be willing to
help with packaging if I could get some direction.
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
+1 Vote
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
=Flock is a social web browser, a GPL fork of Firefox integrated with many
social sites like Flickr, del.icio.us, etc. It also has tools for writing your
blog.=
a perfect "open-id" webbrowser.
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification b
Flock is now at version 1.1 and a really useful and handy web browser.
The get-deb version is brilliant but the icon used in the gnome menu is
incorrect. Any chance of this being added to the Ubuntu repos any time
soon?
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You receive
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
flock is packaged: getdeb: http://www.getdeb.net/category.php?id=7
but indeed not in the offic. repos.of ubuntu.
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: Debian
Status: Unknown => New
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #335459
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335459
** Also affects: Debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335459
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
https://lists.flock.com/pipermail/flock-dev/2007-March/000967.html
This thread at Flock-dev mailing list might be useful for somene who will want
to package Flock.
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Tags added: needs-packaging
--
[needs-packaging] flock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/124933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
26 matches
Mail list logo
