[Bug 1250488] Re: USB hub stopped working on a given USB port (would work on any other port). Reboot fixed the issue

2013-12-17 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
matteo sisti sette, as per http://us.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/drivers an update is available for your BIOS (2.17). If you update to this following https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BiosUpdate , does it change anything? If it doesn't, could you please both specify what happened, and just

[Bug 1250488] Re: USB hub stopped working on a given USB port (would work on any other port). Reboot fixed the issue

2013-12-10 Thread matteo sisti sette
Happened again. Lsusb when the hub is connected to the port where it does not work: $ lsusb Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 003 Device 067: ID 0458:003a KYE Systems Corp. (Mouse

[Bug 1250488] Re: USB hub stopped working on a given USB port (would work on any other port). Reboot fixed the issue

2013-11-12 Thread matteo sisti sette
Here's the output of lsusb now, though now everything works fine so I guess it won't be of much help. Bus 001 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 002 Device 002: ID 8087:0024 Intel Corp. Integrated Rate Matching Hub Bus 003 Device 015: ID 0458:003a KYE Systems

[Bug 1250488] Re: USB hub stopped working on a given USB port (would work on any other port). Reboot fixed the issue

2013-11-12 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1250488 Title: USB

[Bug 1250488] Re: USB hub stopped working on a given USB port (would work on any other port). Reboot fixed the issue

2013-11-12 Thread matteo sisti sette
Why has this been changed to incomplete without an explanation? If it's incomplete, then tell me what is missing. Also, importance medium is wrong. Meets this criteria for critical: - Severely affects applications beyond the package responsible for the root cause or at the very least, these for