*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
David: there is a separate bug for Gutsy, and also this one is
classified as a duplicate. See
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=636397 and
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173890
--
Need to be updated
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
19:04:59 (69.76 KB/s) - `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz' saved
[3036127/3036127]
Download done.
md5sum mismatch install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz
The Flash plugin is NOT installed.
- /etc/apt/s
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
** Also affects: dapper-backports (upstream)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this bug n
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
flash installed for me with flashplugin-
nonfree_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu3_i386.deb
flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.1_i386.deb didn't work.
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https:/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
Harleqin,
Its already in feisty-proposed repos it may be a while until it hits the
security repos, I have been out of town since the day after i asked for the
upload, but it is in proposed.
--
Need to be u
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
For the end user perspective: I checked the "add/remove applications"
(in Xubuntu 7.04, after update), and there the current version of
flashplugin-nonfree seems to be 9.0.31.0.2ubuntu1 . When trying to
instal
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
the md5sum is for a newer version of flash than you had installed we
test this so its less likely that the end users see breakage.
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launch
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
Why is it necessary to update and test the package every time there is a
new flash player release? You basically just change the the MD5 in the
install script. This should be automated because this way flash p
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 125986 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 125233
[flashplugin-nonfree] Arbitrary code execution in Flash Player 9.0.45.0 and
prior versions
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 125233
[flas
The current Feisty SRU is already handled in bug 125233, so I close the
Feisty task of this one.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Feisty)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this
This bug also happens on newly installed machines.
I see Gentoo guys are now downloading a RPM file and unpacking it to get
the required files. See the link to bug report I posted previously. (and
no, Gentoo is not RPM-based)
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.l
Upgrade failed here: I upgraded to flashplugin-nonfree
9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.0 but it didn't download and install the new
upstream blob because the last one from January was left in /var/cache
/flashplugin-nonfree. Deleting the old blob and force reinstall worked.
$ ls -l /var/cache/flashplugin-n
Not sure if this helps, but the related bug report for Gentoo guys is here:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185141
The main reason is upstream changing the tarball without changing its name.
Maybe people from Ubuntu and Gentoo could look at this issue together, because
that's a common prob
Guys, I have just tried installing flash and still get the original
error, When checked I am still downloading version 9.0.31, when is this
likely to reach the main repos. I am happy to use the link above to
install the fix, I am sure others would prefer to download from the main
repos.
--
Need t
Ack, sorry, didn't see the CVE reference and all that (why would
something like that be hidden by default in Launchpad anyway!?)
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Wasn't Adobe's new upload a security fix? Thus, shouldn't this be
handled as a security update, instead of just "feisty-proposed"? Cf.
e.g. http://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/128769/
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You receiv
Whoops; that was the Gutsy package (I'm running Feisty, though like I
said, it works :)
I uninstalled it and installed the Feisty package:
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/f/flashplugin-nonfree/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.0_i386.deb
That works too ^_^
--
Need to b
I downloaded http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/multiverse/f
/flashplugin-nonfree/flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.48.0.0ubuntu2_i386.deb and
installed it with Gdebi; works great :)
http://www.adobe.com/products/flash/about/ indicates that I am now
running flash version "9,0,48,0"
--
Need to be update
The proposed update works well for me so far.
** This bug has been flagged as a security issue
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2007-3456
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this bug notifica
Note that 9.0.31 (the current one in dapper-backports) is vulnerable.
http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb07-12.html
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
see bug #125986 for the updated version 9.0.48.0.0ubuntu2~7.04.0
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Feisty)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this bug notification becau
9.0.48.0.0ubuntu2~7.04.0 has been built and waiting for revu, this fixes
the debian/config md5sums
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Feisty)
Assignee: Alexander Sack => John Vivirito
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You
manually built and installed 9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.0 on my Feisty
machine and it appears to be running perfectly. This was the first
install of flashplugin-nonfree on my machine (not an upgrade).
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Feisty)
Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for U
flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.0) feisty-proposed;
urgency=low
* SRU to fix "fail to install flashplugin-nonfree" grave bug
in feisty (LP: #125131).
* new upstream version 9.0.48.0
* debian/postinst: update md5sums according to files of new upstream version
upstream upda
flashplugin-nonfree (9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low
* new upstream version 9.0.48.0
* debian/postinst: update md5sums according to files of new upstream version
upstream update released on 10 Jul 2007.
-- Alexander Sack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:59:29 +0200
** C
Accepted into feisty-proposed, please go ahead with QA testing.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Feisty)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-motu-needed
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
Y
** Attachment added: "debdiff uploaded to feisty-proposed"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8473548/debdiff-9.0.31.0.2ubuntu1__9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1%7E7.04.0.diff
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this bug notification becaus
just send up to feisty-proposed; please test so we get positive feedback
in line with sru procedure outlined on wiki:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu Feisty)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Alexander Sack
Status: New => In Progress
**
Once it's fixed in gutsy, it'll also need fixing in feisty, along with
edgy- and dapper-backports.
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact fo
To the person that plans on fixing this:
Please make sure the regressions are gone before upgrading to that version if
at all possible, I understand there were some show stopper regressions in this
version but not sure if they have been fixed or not.
--
Need to be updated for new stable version
Please also note, that despite this md5sum mismatch the package itself
is installed. However it's empty, as it doesn't contain the plugin files
it's supposed to (libflashplayer.so etc.).
--
Need to be updated for new stable version (9,0,48,0)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125131
You received th
32 matches
Mail list logo
