Please do not post to this bug. This is the incorrect bug. The issue is
Bug 17390 (a newer bug). Please avoid adding comments to that bug since
the comments are already long enough.
If you want a quick and simple solution (through a fixed deb package),
please see http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread
Ditto me on the checksum error.
By the way, I've stopped recommending Ubuntu to non-technical friends. I
used to think it was pretty much ready to go as a replacement for
Windows, but it has been evolving in a negative direction lately...
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
Kubuntu 7.10 x86
Updated Flash player yesterday after which Flash wouldn't work in
Firefox. Had to uninstall and reinstall to get it working again.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a
Ubuntu 7.10 amd64
I had exactly the same error (never before) when I upgraded to
9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.2.
Uninstalling + Installing flashplugin fixed it. Should this be reopened?
Does anybody else experience this?
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.
Reverted back to old status.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Mr. Coté, this is not the correct bug. The correct bug is bug 173890.
See http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=636397 for more information
on this bug.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because yo
I had this problem now, after the release.
The strange thing is that yesterday after removing and installing flash
plugin nonfre package version 9 did work (I checked it at Adobe's site,)
but today it just went back to version 7.
I used the trick in this page (removing the flash .so library from
Sorry, but I can't figure it out why the "md5sum mismatch" still persists on a
fresh Dapper install (6.06.1).
I've enabled dapper-backports and it's trying to fetch
"flashplugin-nonfree_9.0.31.0.1ubuntu1~dapper1_i386.deb". If I understood
correctly, the version number of the package is irrelevan
Basically I'm just happy that it finally works and that one more thread
linking me to Windows has been cut.
However, I'm doubtful of that explanation for the cause. My
understanding was that the md5sums problem was recent, whereas my Flash
problems on this machine went back for many months. I actu
I believe that is done on ubuntus side and for most it did, i think that
dpkg failed on md5sums created the issue but should no longer be present
everyones should work as expected at this point in time,
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/12598
Eureka! That seems to have done the trick.
I'm greatly appreciative, but I still have to suggest that someone's
installer, either at the Adobe side or Ubuntu side, should be checking
for earlier versions and removing them... Thanks again.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 09:00:09PM -, shanen (Shannon Jacobs) wrote:
> No, the md5sum error went away after the manual editing of the
> sources.list file.
>
> The about:plugins returns the following information, which seems to show
> that a version of the Flash plugin is now installed--but I'm
No, the md5sum error went away after the manual editing of the
sources.list file.
The about:plugins returns the following information, which seems to show
that a version of the Flash plugin is now installed--but I'm pretty sure
this is an old version and that Adobe is currently at 8 or 9? I'm quit
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:08:49AM -, shanen (Shannon Jacobs) wrote:
> Guessing the "you" of the previous post was me. Done that, also
> rebooted, No joy.
>
So do you still get the md5sum mismatch?
When you open about:plugins (type into URL location bar and hit enter)
in firefox ... do you s
Guessing the "you" of the previous post was me. Done that, also
rebooted, No joy.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
u
Can you please to remove flashplugin-nonfree and reinstall it.
sudo apt-get remove --purge flashplusin-nonfree
sudo apt-get install flashplugin-nonfree
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you ar
Oh yes. And a full reboot, too, just to make sure.
Not sure if it will help in the diagnosis, but I'll note that the
particular website that I'm trying to test from is the Comedy Central
website. They have different versions of the video, but I'm using the
same steps that work on a different Ubunt
I interpreted your instructions as meaning to manually edit the
sources.list file to add "multiverse universe" to the line that
mentioned the feisty-updates. After doing this, I started Synaptic and
did a reload, and it now told me that four packages needed to be
upgraded, including the flashplugin
Maybe this has shown us the need for universe and multiverse to be
included in the feisty-updates line?
.. Also, please note that software in
## universe WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu security
## team.
Interesting?
@shanen
Just add universe and multiverse to your feist
Below is the output you requested. I also tried another reinstall just
to see the same error message as before.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list
# deb cdrom:[Ubuntu 5.10 _Breezy Badger_ - Release i386 (20051012)]/ breezy
main restricted
## Major bug fix updates produced after the
Shanen, Please paste the output of cat /etc/apt/sources.list so i can
better help you. This is not the place for support but sinc eyou still
cant get it working I will be glad to try and help you. If you want real
time help please join #ubuntu on irc.freenode.net.
--
[MASTER] No flash after updat
After reading the criticism here I want to say that plenty of us think you are
doing a good job. Also look at
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/10061
for further help.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this
Well, putting on my professional technical editor hat, I would ask you
[John Vivirito] to be careful about the precision of your wording. You
seemed to be asking me about the update repositories, which do appear on
a specific Updates tab of the Settings->Repositories. However, it now
appears you we
Crazy was to CrazyTerabyte not to you. we update packages as fast as
possible. Im not saying we are flawless but we as in ubuntu are always looking
for more people to help out with packaging and fixing bugs or just helping in
forums or on iRC but we cant get everything fixed "right a way". I
All of the update repositories are enabled except for pre-release. I
really don't want to do any beta testing that I can avoid.
I'm not sure what you mean by "crazy", and I don't want to say anything
about the complexity of your work. I'm even willing to go somewhat out
of my way to answer any que
Shanen did you enable feisty-update repos?
Crazy, we have thousands of packages to work on for gutsy once fixed in gutsy
we can talk about building for feisty. Since these packages are NOT really
maintained we try our best to do it as soon as possible.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flash
What I'm seeing here (every time I try to reinstall) is the download
seems to work to 100%, it announces the download is finished, then
announces the md5sum mismatch on the gz file, and concludes with a
notice that the Flash plugin is NOT installed.
Works fine on another machine. I saw a lot of di
Ok, looks like this update has been finally added to main repository.
Now I can say: problem solved. 2 weeks and half after the issue has been
detected. I don't want to troll here, but just think to yourselves how
many people might have just installed Ubuntu in that time, and found
that flashplayer
Its very hard to get an update into a stable dist. as it is since one
bad upload can hurt your system. This is a security update there for it
belongs in feisty-updates but feisty-proposed is to test the package
before uploading to see if it will break systems. than we can move it to
feisty-updates.
But again, why this flash update can't be added to the default repository?
(or it will, but only after a long period of time?)
Without adding any extra repository, I received a firefox update, among
some other packages. Why not flashplayer too?
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-no
CrazyTerabyte: Someone actually filed a bug report about that, BTW :)
Bug #119248 in apt (Ubuntu)
first reported on 2007-06-08 by ih
feisty-updates not enabled by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/119248
So hopefully it will be enabled in Gutsy (due in the third week of
O
I ask to myself if the average Ubuntu user will be able to figure that
by himself.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
CrazyTerabyte: The update (9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.1) is in the feisty-
updates repository, in multiverse.
The version you were trying to install is the old one
(9.0.31.0.2ubuntu1) from the regular feisty multiverse repository.
In Synaptic, go Settings -> Repositories
In the "Updates" tab, put an
Is the update already commited to the main repository? I have a new
ubuntu system (installed about two weeks ago) and I still can't install
flashplayer correctly. Here is the synaptic output:
(there is also a side-bug, because synaptic window says "Successfully
applied all changes", I may post the
b, can you please give me output of a few commands,
1. apt-cache policy flashplugin-nonfree
2. cat /etc/apt/sources.list
3. Can you please than remove and purge flashplugin-nonfree from your system
and install it with apt-get see if it helps
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfr
What does about:plugins show?
The upgrade package worked OK for me, I see the Flash player version OK.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug cont
Hey all,
So now the flash plugin is supposedly installed. Apt says this:
08:57:55 (578.85 KB/s) - `./install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz' saved
[2608602/2608602]
Download done.
Flash Plugin installed.
Problem is that according to firefox there is no installed flash-player.
Anyhow else seeing t
Works on dapper too. Can this be pushed to dapper-backports to replace the old
one there?
Thanks everyone for all your hard work.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Thank you everyone for the responses.
Martin thank you for pushing to -updates.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubu
Copied to feisty-updates.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
It's working on both my feisty and gutsy.
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
Indeed the package in proposed is working.
Thanks,
.b.
b wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've not added the feisty-proposed stuff to sources.list, and I'm
> getting the same error.
>
> Any ETA when the fix will move from proposed into the main repo?
>
> Thanks,
> B.
>
> John Vivirito wrote:
>> Can i get a f
Hi,
I've not added the feisty-proposed stuff to sources.list, and I'm
getting the same error.
Any ETA when the fix will move from proposed into the main repo?
Thanks,
B.
John Vivirito wrote:
> Can i get a few users to confirm and comment that it works now. Flash
> can be installed and works as
** Tags added: verification-motu-done
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
I have one confirmation (soon may become two) from a user here:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/10061
I quote:
"Thanks Rouben, adding the feisty-proposed repository solved the problem.
Installed the latest version of flashplugin with that, and running perfectly on
firefox.
Thanks"
It's working fine :-)
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
Works here.
9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.1
On 29/07/07, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can i get a few users to confirm and comment that it works now. Flash
> can be installed and works as expected.
>
> ** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Invalid
>
> --
> [MASTER] No fla
Can i get a few users to confirm and comment that it works now. Flash
can be installed and works as expected.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125986
You received this bug notifi
I don't want to be a troll here, but take a look on how Gentoo guys have
fixed this:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=185141
Maybe Ubuntu can take a similar approach?
Other related URLs:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/gentoo-x86/net-www/netscape-flash/ChangeLog
http://pack
As commented in duplicate bug #125233 and bug #125131, the flashplugin-
nonfree (9.0.48.0.0ubuntu1~7.04.1) now in feisty-proposed will not
update the actual plug-in if the system already has a /var/cache
/flashplugin-nonfree/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz from a previous
install.
BTW, if this
** Summary changed:
- No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
+ [MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: firefox => flashplugin-nonfree
--
[MASTER] No flash after update of flashplugin-nonfree
https://bugs.launchpa
51 matches
Mail list logo
