Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548
Title:
smb.conf contains valid users = %S in [global]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548
Title:
smb.
Hi Robie,
Yes, there is a "valid users = %S" line present in the smb.conf file.
When I comment it out, smbclient -L works as expected.
What i did:
1) Comment out "valid users = %S", see the diff:
> root@ubuntu:/etc/samba# diff -u ~/smb.conf.old smb.conf
> --- /root/smb.conf.old 2014-04-01 18:19:
** Also affects: samba (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: High
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548
Title:
Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (s
Please can you see if this is bug 1296289, and if the fix there (the
"valid users" line) works?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548
Title:
Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.
** Tags added: rls-s-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292548
Title:
Standalone Server: Update from Samba 2:3.6.18-1ubuntu3.1 (saucy) to
2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 (trusty) breaks
> #!/bin/sh
>
> VER=4.1.6+dfsg-1
> ARCH=amd64
>
> for p in samba samba-common-bin samba-dsdb-modules samba-vfs-modules
> samba-libs libwbclient0 python-samba smbclient libsmbclient; do
> wget
> "http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/${p}_${VER}_${ARCH}.deb";
> done
>
> wget
> "
If anyone wants to quickly update to the packages from Debian until this
issue is fixed, here some wget lines for retrieving them:
wget
"http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba_4.1.5+dfsg-1_amd64.deb";
wget
"http://ftp.at.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/samba/samba-common_4.1.5+dfs
Dear Robie,
actually, it is quite easy to reproduce during an update from saucy to
trusty and i suspect that this bug will even strike when you do a clean
trusty install.
Nevertheless, i reproduced this issue with a fresh saucy install:
1. install saucy using
http://at.mirror.archive.ubuntu.com
Thanks. So 2:4.1.3+dfsg-2ubuntu3 from Trusty has this issue, but
2:4.1.5+dfsg-1 from Debian does not? Sounds like we need to either merge
it, or figure out the fix and apply it.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =
I don't see exact reproduction steps though. Please can you supply this,
so that developers can focus on the bug, rather than having to second
guess what you did first? These should be steps to reproduce the problem
including starting on a fresh Saucy instance, configuring samba as you
had done, an
Thank you for your fast reply.
Updating Samba 3 to Samba 4 *is* possible, please see
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba .
There might be some configuration changes but all in all it is no big
deal to manually merge them - at least not for a basic setup without any
active directory (A
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
The upgrade from samba 3 to samba 4 is a major change, and I wouldn't
expect automatic upgrades to be possible in all cases. Please can you
check upstream release notes and confirm that this is even possible, and
t
13 matches
Mail list logo
