[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2015-09-03 Thread Stefan Bader
Thanks James, unfortunately its the build-dependency on edk2/ovmf which prevents me from picking this right now (ovmf is multiverse and at least xen source is main). And really sorry Fantu, this cycle I had no time at all to do realistic improvements to the packaging at all. The only thing I am

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2015-09-03 Thread Stefan Bader
Thanks James, unfortunately its the build-dependency on edk2/ovmf which prevents me from picking this right now (ovmf is multiverse and at least xen source is main). And really sorry Fantu, this cycle I had no time at all to do realistic improvements to the packaging at all. The only thing I am

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2015-09-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: xen (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xen in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297224

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2015-09-02 Thread James Dingwall
I have built the xen sources from wily with the following patch to enable HVM guest UEFI support: diff -ur xen-4.5.0.orig/debian/control xen-4.5.0/debian/control --- xen-4.5.0.orig/debian/control 2015-02-24 18:14:03.0 + +++ xen-4.5.0/debian/control2015-04-11

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2015-09-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: xen (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297224 Title:

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2015-09-02 Thread James Dingwall
I have built the xen sources from wily with the following patch to enable HVM guest UEFI support: diff -ur xen-4.5.0.orig/debian/control xen-4.5.0/debian/control --- xen-4.5.0.orig/debian/control 2015-02-24 18:14:03.0 + +++ xen-4.5.0/debian/control2015-04-11

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-06-19 Thread Fantu
Also xendomains init update tested (on debian sid) and working. Can be used also on ubuntu with cherry-pick of: https://github.com/Fantu/pkg-xen/commit/6f0ef68441c2c8e20e7170df25821baa8b03515d https://github.com/Fantu/pkg-xen/commit/0b7bda2d553655c345f09f9814aae43bccec6130 -- You received this

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-06-19 Thread Fantu
Also xendomains init update tested (on debian sid) and working. Can be used also on ubuntu with cherry-pick of: https://github.com/Fantu/pkg-xen/commit/6f0ef68441c2c8e20e7170df25821baa8b03515d https://github.com/Fantu/pkg-xen/commit/0b7bda2d553655c345f09f9814aae43bccec6130 -- You received this

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-06-04 Thread Stefan Bader
Hi Fantu, sorry for the delay but I was busy with other things. And I cannot promise how quickly I can look into your improvements. In the end I would prefer to have things the same in Debian and Ubuntu but unfortunately this might be difficult. So it might happen that we have to keep things more

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-06-04 Thread Stefan Bader
Hi Fantu, sorry for the delay but I was busy with other things. And I cannot promise how quickly I can look into your improvements. In the end I would prefer to have things the same in Debian and Ubuntu but unfortunately this might be difficult. So it might happen that we have to keep things more

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-06-01 Thread Fantu
Seabios package from version 1.7.5-1 removes the xen support in 128k build, than the seabios build change to 256k is needed for future build on utopic: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/s/seabios/seabios_1.7.5-1/changelog -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-06-01 Thread Fantu
Seabios package from version 1.7.5-1 removes the xen support in 128k build, than the seabios build change to 256k is needed for future build on utopic: http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/s/seabios/seabios_1.7.5-1/changelog -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-05-24 Thread Fantu
Changes tested and working: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2014-05/msg00187.html I did also xendomain init and default update but need to be tested: https://github.com/Fantu/pkg-xen/commit/6f0ef68441c2c8e20e7170df25821baa8b03515d -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-05-24 Thread Fantu
Changes tested and working: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2014-05/msg00187.html I did also xendomain init and default update but need to be tested: https://github.com/Fantu/pkg-xen/commit/6f0ef68441c2c8e20e7170df25821baa8b03515d -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-05-11 Thread Fantu
I did some small improments: * Build with distro's seabios with xen configure instead patch. * Use seabios 256k build instead the 128k one, because in the 128k the xen support will be disabled in future. * Use distro's upstream qemu with xen configure instead patches. * Removed patches

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-05-11 Thread Fantu
I did some small improments: * Build with distro's seabios with xen configure instead patch. * Use seabios 256k build instead the 128k one, because in the 128k the xen support will be disabled in future. * Use distro's upstream qemu with xen configure instead patches. * Removed patches

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-05-10 Thread Fantu
I can not find the updated repository of packages xen in ubuntu. Someone is making improvements? If not, if I have enough time I start to make some public and patches. Thanks for any reply. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-05-10 Thread Fantu
I can not find the updated repository of packages xen in ubuntu. Someone is making improvements? If not, if I have enough time I start to make some public and patches. Thanks for any reply. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-24 Thread Fantu
Recently on xen 4.5 staging git were added some tool's flags patches, I do not have time to check the ubuntu patches but in the TODO for 4.5 maybe you should also mark to check about them that perhaps other ubuntu patches can be removed. Same thing also about a patch serie for tools prefix:

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-24 Thread Fantu
Recently on xen 4.5 staging git were added some tool's flags patches, I do not have time to check the ubuntu patches but in the TODO for 4.5 maybe you should also mark to check about them that perhaps other ubuntu patches can be removed. Same thing also about a patch serie for tools prefix:

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Stefan Bader
Supporting flexible locations of qemu and alternate location for the ovmf BIOS would allow to get rid of patches. So sounds useful. Note that the 14.04 (Trusty) release of Ubuntu (as well as the 13.10 (Saucy) release) were not using the Xen version of qemu for xl but the generic upstream qemu

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Fantu
Thanks for your reply. I not tried xen trusty package for now but only a fast watch on debian folder of packages source. seabios and upstream qemu is not specified on configure for what I saw (./configure --enable-xend --prefix=/usr) and I think should be done to have seabios and upstream qemu

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Fantu
Ah... I think that probably is also good put qemu-system-x86 as dipendency since is default for disks on file also on pv domUs. Is used also for vnc (and spice basic support if my patch will be accepted on xen 4.5) on pv domUs. Then using the 4.4 xl seem to me a few cases where it is not used,

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Stefan Bader
qemu-system-x86 is on the recommends list which will pull in upstream qemu. Right now the build of Xen modifies the source in a way to look for qemu-system-i386 on the path provided by qemu. This also causes seabios to be used. ovmf would need testing. Ovmf was not really looked at. So for the

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Fantu
Sorry for my bad english. I not understand if you mean right. About seabios, upstream qemu and ovmf from distro package I mean simply for example: for seabios ./configure ... --with-system-seabios=/usr/share/seabios/bios.bin and remove tools-firmware-seabios-packaged patch. About ovmf is better

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Fantu
I saw now the test I did with qemu from debian packages and I always use /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64, since xen not use emulated cpu _64 or not should not be different but probably is different for spice-server that if I remember good have problem on 32 bit. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Stefan Bader
So we talk about different sides. Debian has not, yet packaged up Xen-4.4 (there was a post to Debian today asking how we can change that), I did package Xen-4.4 for Ubuntu Trusty (14.04). That does a lot of the things you were suggesting. Maybe not all in a way that will be ok with Debian. I

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Stefan Bader
Supporting flexible locations of qemu and alternate location for the ovmf BIOS would allow to get rid of patches. So sounds useful. Note that the 14.04 (Trusty) release of Ubuntu (as well as the 13.10 (Saucy) release) were not using the Xen version of qemu for xl but the generic upstream qemu

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Fantu
Thanks for your reply. I not tried xen trusty package for now but only a fast watch on debian folder of packages source. seabios and upstream qemu is not specified on configure for what I saw (./configure --enable-xend --prefix=/usr) and I think should be done to have seabios and upstream qemu

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Fantu
Ah... I think that probably is also good put qemu-system-x86 as dipendency since is default for disks on file also on pv domUs. Is used also for vnc (and spice basic support if my patch will be accepted on xen 4.5) on pv domUs. Then using the 4.4 xl seem to me a few cases where it is not used,

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Stefan Bader
qemu-system-x86 is on the recommends list which will pull in upstream qemu. Right now the build of Xen modifies the source in a way to look for qemu-system-i386 on the path provided by qemu. This also causes seabios to be used. ovmf would need testing. Ovmf was not really looked at. So for the

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Fantu
Sorry for my bad english. I not understand if you mean right. About seabios, upstream qemu and ovmf from distro package I mean simply for example: for seabios ./configure ... --with-system-seabios=/usr/share/seabios/bios.bin and remove tools-firmware-seabios-packaged patch. About ovmf is better

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Fantu
I saw now the test I did with qemu from debian packages and I always use /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64, since xen not use emulated cpu _64 or not should not be different but probably is different for spice-server that if I remember good have problem on 32 bit. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-22 Thread Stefan Bader
So we talk about different sides. Debian has not, yet packaged up Xen-4.4 (there was a post to Debian today asking how we can change that), I did package Xen-4.4 for Ubuntu Trusty (14.04). That does a lot of the things you were suggesting. Maybe not all in a way that will be ok with Debian. I

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-18 Thread Fantu
** Also affects: xen (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to xen in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297224 Title: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support To

[Bug 1297224] Re: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support

2014-04-18 Thread Fantu
** Also affects: xen (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297224 Title: Improve xen packages and hvm domUs support To manage