[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2015-06-13 Thread John Johansen
not really, comm= added by the audit subsystem and is set by the thread the check is being done in, in kernel context. Both the send and receive check are being done in the same place so comm= will not change. We are not in control of this so there is little we can do about it. -- You received

[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2015-06-13 Thread Christian Boltz
Just to make sure this doesn't get lost/overlooked: # Oddly, comm=kill is in both denials, despite the denials being for send and receive masks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317555

[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2015-06-10 Thread Kees Cook
Hit this bug again while trying to use: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/apparmor-profiles/master/view/head:/ubuntu/14.04/usr.lib.postgresql.bin.postgres -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2014-10-23 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Tags added: aa-parser -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317555 Title: 'signal peer=@{profile_name},' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name To

[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2014-10-15 Thread Jamie Strandboge
** Changed in: apparmor Importance: High = Medium ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: High = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317555 Title: 'signal

[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2014-10-08 Thread Jamie Strandboge
Is this bug actually 'High' priority? It seems more like medium or possibly low. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1317555 Title: 'signal peer=@{profile_name},' does not work as

[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2014-05-08 Thread Kees Cook
Thanks for helping debug this! Similarly, using the extended profile name and executable path definition style: profile test /tmp/test/{kill,sleep} { ... works too, without need for aa-exec -p. With that work-around, I'm able to get my profile running happily again. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2014-05-08 Thread Tyler Hicks
John says that the bug is in the parser: 11:18 jjohansen tyhicks: so the problem is the profile name vs. the expression 11:20 tyhicks I'm not following 11:20 jjohansen the profile name when a regex is used is the literal string 11:20 jjohansen /{a,b} { } 11:20 jjohansen is equiv to 11:20

[Bug 1317555] Re: 'signal peer=@{profile_name}, ' does not work as expected when in a profile using a regex match as a name

2014-05-08 Thread Tyler Hicks
Here's a patch for the automated parser tests that can be used to verify the fix for this bug. ** Patch added: 0001-parser-Equality-tests-for-peer-profile_name-and-patt.patch