This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.13.0-30.54
---
linux (3.13.0-30.54) trusty; urgency=low
[ Adam Conrad ]
* [Config] Enable building the sata-modules udeb on ppc64el.
- LP: #1323980
[ Anton Blanchard ]
* SAUCE: (no-up) powerpc: 64bit sendfile is capped at 2GB
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/trusty/linux-keystone
/trusty-proposed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324571
Title:
powerpc: enable powernv-cpufreq as built-in (vs. modu
** Tags removed: verification-needed-trusty
** Tags added: verification-done-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324571
Title:
powerpc: enable powernv-cpufreq as built-in (vs. modu
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed-
trusty' to 'verification-done-trusty'.
If verification is not done by 5 working days from t
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.15.0-6.11
---
linux (3.15.0-6.11) utopic; urgency=low
[ Adam Conrad ]
* Enable building the sata-modules udeb on ppc64el.
- LP: #1323980
* [Packaging] Set bootloader and loader on ppc64el to grub
[ Adam Lee ]
* SAUCE: (no-up
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/precise-proposed/linux-lts-trusty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324571
Title:
powerpc: enable powernv-cpufreq as built-in (vs. module)
To manage notific
(And, for the record, it only needs to be on in the powerpc64-smp
flavour, as none of the other flavours could conceivably boot on a
POWER8/OPAL system anyway)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
The claim that "That cpufreq driver fails gracefully on other (non IBM,
OPAL) powerpc platforms that don't have the expected files in the
device-tree" seems to imply it should be perfectly harmless on pre-
power8 platforms. Of course, I'll put it through its paces on a couple
such machines to make
Adam - I was not positive that this change was generally applicable, so
I chose to be conservative. I'll enable it for powerpc as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324571
Title:
p
In reviewing the latest SRU upload, I see that Tim only enabled this on
ppc64el/generic. It would probably be a good idea to enable this on
powerpc/powerpc64-smp as well, as both kernels should be able to install
and boot on POWER8 bare metal. Can we get this changed, either for this
SRU cycle or
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1324571
Title:
powerpc: enable powernv-cpufreq as built-in (vs. module)
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Utopic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
Assignee
Hi,
> This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem. [...]
> [...]
> This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the Ubuntu
> Kernel Team.
Since the problem's diagnostic is clear (i.e., see the current config
files), and the patch sent to the kernel-te
13 matches
Mail list logo
