Could you propose this as a guideline or possible risk that all
packagers should look at when packaging?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132459
Title:
Store intensively accessed cache
Thanks for taking the time to report this and help make Ubuntu better.
Unfortunately you would need to report bugs to each of those projects
individually to have this fixed.
In present systems swithing them to use /run might be best
-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filesystem_Hierarchy_Standard
**
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => ubuntu-meta
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
Assignee: Brian Murray (brian-murray) => (unassigned)
--
Store intensively accessed cache files in /tmp instead of in nfs-mounted /home
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132459
You r
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
Store intensively accessed cache files in /tmp instead of in nfs-mounted /home
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132459
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
-
As a quick fix I manually created some links so that these cache
directories with intensive read and write actions was not on my NFS
mounted home directory. so if nothing has been done this problem still
exists. For users that have an NFS mounted home and which are not expert
users, you can expect
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
any activity in recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue
for you? Thanks in advance.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Bria
