Public bug reported:

Updating the kernel package in Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS to linux-image-
generic-lts-trusty (3.13.0.30.26) results in a failing virtualbox-dkms
module compilation:


$ LANG=C sudo dpkg-reconfigure virtualbox-dkms
------------------------------
Deleting module version: 4.1.12
completely from the DKMS tree.
------------------------------
Done.
Loading new virtualbox-4.1.12 DKMS files...
Building only for 3.13.0-30-generic
Building initial module for 3.13.0-30-generic
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.13.0-30-generic (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/make.log for more information.


Here is the content of /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/make.log:

DKMS make.log for virtualbox-4.1.12 for kernel 3.13.0-30-generic (x86_64)
Sat Jul 12 12:34:19 CEST 2014
make: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-30-generic'
  LD      /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/built-in.o
  LD      /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/built-in.o
  CC [M]  /var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.o
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 
'vboxdrvLinuxUid':
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:226:5: 
error: incompatible types when returning type 'kuid_t' but 'RTUID' was expected
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 
'vboxdrvLinuxGid':
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:235:5: 
error: incompatible types when returning type 'kgid_t' but 'RTGID' was expected
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 
'vboxdrvLinuxEuid':
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:244:5: 
error: incompatible types when returning type 'kuid_t' but 'RTUID' was expected
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:248:1: 
warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 
'vboxdrvLinuxUid':
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:230:1: 
warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c: In function 
'vboxdrvLinuxGid':
/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.c:239:1: 
warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
make[2]: *** 
[/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv/linux/SUPDrv-linux.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build/vboxdrv] Error 2
make: *** [_module_/var/lib/dkms/virtualbox/4.1.12/build] Error 2
make: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-3.13.0-30-generic'

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-30.55~precise1-generic 3.13.11.2
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-30-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.6
Architecture: amd64
DKMSKernelVersion: 3.13.0-30-generic
Date: Sat Jul 12 11:58:05 2014
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
PackageVersion: 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6
SourcePackage: virtualbox
Title: virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel 
module failed to build
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-12-16 (572 days ago)
VirtualBox.ModInfo:

** Affects: virtualbox (Ubuntu)
     Importance: Undecided
         Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1341101

Title:
  virtualbox-guest-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6: virtualbox-guest kernel
  module failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1341101/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to