[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2017-03-13 Thread Michał Sawicz
** Project changed: qtmir => qtmir (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1352251 Title: Reverse trust prompt hosting To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-02-13 Thread Michał Sawicz
We discussed this with tvoss in Brussels, there's an improvement on the architecture of this that we want to happen, but AFAIU it's not critical to any user experience at the moment. IMO this should be pulled off the RTM list. ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Confirmed

Re: [Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-02-13 Thread David Barth
Agreed. I thought this could solve focus issues we're experiencing with trust prompts But Saviq confirmed this is unrelated. So I agree that all system clients that would benefit from that have otherwise found ways around this and there is no user experience broken by the absence of this I can

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-02-13 Thread Pat McGowan
** No longer affects: canonical-devices-system-image -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1352251 Title: Reverse trust prompt hosting To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-02-13 Thread Michał Sawicz
Explaining per kgunn's request: What we have currently is: whatever initiates a trusted session provides a PID of the process it wants to open the prompt on. The problem there is that trusted helpers need not necessarily know what that PID should be, because the request might come from a scope,

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-02-12 Thread Pat McGowan
is this going to get attention this iteration? ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Assignee: Canonical Devices Products (canonical-devices-products-team) = David Barth (dbarth) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-02-05 Thread Michał Sawicz
Alberto, having talked through this with tvoss we think we found a sustainable solution for your use case. Just make sure to use ${MIR_SOCKET}_trusted for no-UI oxide thingy. You don't need anything special to connect to that, no need to create a trusted session or anything. -- You received this

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-01-28 Thread Pat McGowan
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Milestone: ww05-2015 = ww09-2015 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1352251 Title: Reverse trust prompt hosting To manage notifications

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-01-16 Thread kevin gunn
note, we need to address this for this bug as well bug 1387691 see comments #9 10 ** Changed in: qtmir Status: Opinion = Triaged ** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion = Triaged ** Changed in: unity8 (Ubuntu RTM) Status: Opinion = Triaged -- You received this bug

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2015-01-13 Thread Michał Sawicz
I don't think we'll manage to make all the necessary changes by ww05, might need to push further out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1352251 Title: Reverse trust prompt hosting To

[Bug 1352251] Re: Reverse trust prompt hosting

2014-12-11 Thread Alberto Mardegan
I tried one of the suggested workarounds, that is setting QT_QPA_PLATFORM=minimal before opening the online-accounts-ui when we know that the client doesn't want any UI to be shown on top of it. Unfortunately this doesn't work, as oxide won't work with the minimal backend: