I dont see a reason to keep this open. Its not going to happen.
chuck
--
Samba Backport Urgently Needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137656
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs
I dont see a reason to keep this open. Its not going to happen.
chuck
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
** Changed in: dapper-backports
Status: New = Invalid
--
Samba Backport Urgently Needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137656
You received this bug
Oh, that? Sorry, I've long since moved to CentOS. Must check out Ubuntu
again soon and see if they are really serious about enterprise servers. But
I confess that I still love the Ubuntu Desktop :-)
On 11 June 2010 14:19, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote:
I dont see a reason to keep
I dont see a reason to keep this open. Its not going to happen.
chuck
--
Samba Backport Urgently Needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137656
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I dont see a reason to keep this open. Its not going to happen.
chuck
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
** Changed in: dapper-backports
Status: New = Invalid
--
Samba Backport Urgently Needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137656
You received this bug
Oh, that? Sorry, I've long since moved to CentOS. Must check out Ubuntu
again soon and see if they are really serious about enterprise servers. But
I confess that I still love the Ubuntu Desktop :-)
On 11 June 2010 14:19, Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com wrote:
I dont see a reason to keep
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
Samba Backport Urgently Needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137656
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
Samba Backport Urgently Needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137656
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 07:57:57PM -, jshanks wrote:
[...] Samba has pretty much been treated as the redhead stepchild.
I'm not familiar with this idiom. I'm not a readhead nor a stepchild, so
I'm in no position to make assumptions about their care takers' attitude
towards them, but I gather
: [Bug 137656] Re: Samba Backport Urgently Needed
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:35:52AM -, rvjcallanan wrote:
Please Soren, I know you probably work your ass off on this
stuff, but
try not to be so precious. I am just a humble infrastructure guy
trying to make things *actually work
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:35:52AM -, rvjcallanan wrote:
Please Soren, I know you probably work your ass off on this stuff, but
try not to be so precious. I am just a humble infrastructure guy
trying to make things *actually work*. My lack of expertise regarding
what goes on in your
Please Soren, I know you probably work your ass off on this stuff, but try not
to be so precious.
I am just a humble infrastructure guy trying to make things *actually work*. My
lack of expertise regarding what goes on in your domain should not in any way
detract from my basic requirement that
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2006-3403
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2007-0452
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2007-0454
** CVE removed: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:57:45PM -, rvjcallanan wrote:
What you are asking isn't security problem, but a wish for latest and
greatest. This will not happen in stable release. You could
come up with same question for every single package.
Actually no, I'm *not* looking for the latest
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 04:21:08AM -, jshanks wrote:
(1) The security patches are backported
(2) The bugfix patches are at least considered for backporting if they apply
to the default sane configuration.
This is to a great extent what we do already.
Any new functionality should be
Okay friends,
Let's start off this week on a constructive note.
I have now whittled down my VAST NUMBER OF VERY SERIOUS BUGS to a list of
bare essentials which, if backported to Ubuntu 6.06 Server Edition LTS/Samba
3.0.22, will fulfill my requirements for implementing a workable Microsoft SBS
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which
is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper
developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at
Backports are handled through the release specific Backports projects on
Launchpad.
** Also affects: dapper-backports
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
Samba Backport Urgently Needed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137656
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:35:24PM -, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Backports are handled through the release specific Backports projects on
Launchpad.
Yes, but as I pointed out, a backport is not possible in this case, and
it may not even be appropriate.
affects ubuntu/samba
status confirmed
also are you sure these bugs mentioned arent fixed in one of the three
security updates that sit in dapper-security ? you didnt give the porper
version number of the samba package in the inital bugreport, note that
serious security bugs get fixed all the time, so many of your VAST
NUMBER OF VERY
rvjcallanan - I feel your pain on this one.
For the past 5 years I've been managing two networks running Linux/Samba
servers as primary domain controllers with no Microsoft servers and a
mix of Linux and Windows clients.
In every distribution that I've tested
rvjcallanan wrote:
I detect from your replies some bad karma between Ubuntu and the Samba
team. It does seem, with the benefit of hindsight, that the onus is more
on the Samba side.
I really don't know where you got this feeling, but that's not true.
This has nothing to do with Samba, but
What you are asking isn't security problem, but a wish for latest and
greatest. This will not happen in stable release. You could
come up with same question for every single package.
Actually no, I'm *not* looking for the latest and greatest, just something that
works.
My configuration is
I'm not sure that the Samba Team is really the right place to lay blame
for the lack of a stable Linux/Samba server. They are coders. Samba is
not an application like OpenOffice.org, or Totem. Samba is a very
complicated CIFS server with most of the bells and whistles. And they
really don't
24 matches
Mail list logo
