[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2015-05-01 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: linux Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-15 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.16.0-28.38 --- linux (3.16.0-28.38) utopic; urgency=low [ Brad Figg ] * Release Tracking Bug - LP: #1401966 [ Upstream Kernel Changes ] * net: skb_fclone_busy() needs to detect orphaned skb - LP: #1401079 -- Brad Figg

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-10 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.16.0-26.35 --- linux (3.16.0-26.35) utopic; urgency=low [ Brad Figg ] * Release Tracking Bug - LP: #1398118 [ Upstream Kernel Changes ] * Revert drm/nouveau: punt fbcon resume out to a workqueue * Revert drm/nouveau/kms:

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-04 Thread Andy Whitcroft
For total clarity. The fixes here were not verified (as they did not fix the issue possibly after a BIOS update) and are therefore reverted in the kernel. When this closed shortly on release of the reverted kernel, that will be an error, and the bug will need reopening. We will retest against

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-04 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Andy Whitcroft, thanks for your comment. As per the original reporter Nik.Th. the kernel that fixes this problem is http://people.canonical.com/~apw/lp1386695-utopic/ , both before and after the BIOS update. So, while it's unfortunate a BIOS update didn't fix this issue, it certainly didn't

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-04 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
more/less = more or less of the intending fix commits released recently in Utopic Proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation,

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Nik.Th.
Sorry but I cannot confirm the fix. The latest kernel available (3.16.0-25-33) is not working. Of course the -proposed repositories are always enabled in my testing system. I really don't know what happened, but I can assume that the latest BIOS update changed something. Yes, I have updated my

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Nik.Th., just to advise, as per https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux the Proposed kernel is 3.16.0-26.34 since 2014-11-25. If you have 3.16.0-25-33, then either you didn't setup the Proposed repository correctly, or you have the software pinned so that you aren't pulling down the Proposed

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Nik.Th., could you please provide the output of the following terminal command: sudo dmidecode -s bios-version sudo dmidecode -s bios-release-date ** Tags added: bios-outdated-17.a -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Nik.Th.
@penalvch I just got the latest Kernel (linux-image-3.16.0-26.34) but unfortunately it does not work either. The only kernel that still works is listed in comment #33 above. I have attached the results. ** Attachment added: dmidecode-biosver.txt

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Tags removed: bios-outdated-17.a performing-bisect ** Tags added: latest-bios-v17.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Not Fix Released as per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1386695/comments/33 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1386695/comments/36 . Hence, this bug report will not be closed as advised in

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Nik.Th.
** Tags removed: reverse-bisect-done ** Tags added: bisect-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
As per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/vivid/+source/linux/+bug/1386695/comments/37 . ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: Fix Committed = Triaged ** Tags removed: bisect-done ** Tags added: reverse-bisect-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed-utopic ** Tags added:

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided = Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Nik.Th.
@Christopher M. Penalver sorry, I'll let you hande the tags, it seems we edit them at the same time. Please fix any errors. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title:

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-12-01 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Tags removed: bisect-done ** Tags added: reverse-bisect-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-11-30 Thread Brad Figg
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the results. If the problem is solved, change the tag 'verification-needed- utopic' to 'verification-done-utopic'. If verification is not done by 5 working days from

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-11-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/trusty-proposed/linux-lts-utopic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-11-07 Thread Tim Gardner
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Vivid) Importance: Medium Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw) Status: Triaged ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Utopic) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: linux

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-31 Thread Nik.Th.
After another exhausting searching and testing, and again with the **priceless** help of @apw in IRC, I(we) may have detect the three responsible commits for the fix. Probably they are three and not one, and certainly the MERGE in which I refer on the above comment #27, it cannot be merged into

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-31 Thread Nik.Th.
After another exhausting searching and testing, and again with the **priceless** help of @apw in IRC, I(we) may have detect the three commits which are responsible for the fix. Yes, probably they are three and not one, and certainly the MERGE in which I refer on the above comment #27, it cannot

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-31 Thread Nik.Th.
** Description changed: - I'm testing the new development branch (Vivid Vervet), which currently - has the Utopic kernel 3.16.0-23-generic installed (proposed repositories - are enabled). + I'm testing the new development branch (Vivid Vervet), which currently has the Utopic kernel

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-31 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Ok I looked at backporting these three commits. To cut a long story short one of these is not needed because it is only applicable at the higher level (though needed there) and one is actually for dpms issues. This leaves the commit below: commit 63621dafc8e140afdfa12c8deadb41af818e455d

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-30 Thread Andy Whitcroft
git bisect looks for a commit which introduces an issue. You are trying to find a commit which _fixes_ and issue. This makes it a reverse bisect, and for reasons that means you have to use good and bad backwards, non-intuitive and confusing I know. In your log you seem to have correctly swapped

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-30 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
** Tags removed: needs-reverse-bisect ** Tags added: unable-to-reverse-bisect ** Tags added: cherry-pick ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-30 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Would you like me to assist you with the reverse bisect? I can perform the bisect and build the test kernel, which you can use to test. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title:

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-30 Thread Joseph Salisbury
** Tags added: performing-bisect -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression To manage notifications

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-30 Thread Nik.Th.
@jsalisbury thanks for offering assistance and willing to help. I've finished the process of reverse bisecting and I have spotted some good(bad) commits. With the **priceless** help of @apw in IRC I have learned the correct procedure of reverse bisecting (it was a real learning curve!) Here is

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-30 Thread Nik.Th.
** Tags removed: unable-to-reverse-bisect ** Tags added: bisect-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1386695 Title: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-30 Thread Nik.Th.
Ok, further searching showed that the commit that actually solves this problem is a merge branch 'for-linus' . Specifically this one: [7d1419f30cc5106196e54a282d7e115e698c95f6] Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.samba.org/sfrench/cifs-2.6 I will say the truth that this one tricked me a lot.

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-29 Thread Nik.Th.
It seems I'm unable to narrow down the commit. I can assure (because I have tested this twice) the last bad kernel is 3.17.0-rc7-utopic (http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v3.17-rc7-utopic/) and the first good one 3.17.0-utopic (http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-29 Thread Nik.Th.
It seems I'm unable to narrow down the commit. I can assure (because I have tested this twice) the last bad kernel is 3.17.0-rc7-utopic (http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v3.17-rc7-utopic/) and the first good one 3.17.0-utopic (http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-28 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream stable kernel? Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest v3.13 stable kernel[0]. If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'. If the mainline kernel

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-28 Thread Joseph Salisbury
Actually could you test the latest 3.16 upstream stable kernel, which is 3.13.6: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.16.6-utopic/ The 3.13 kernel would be for Trusty, but you reported this against Utopic. Sorry for the confusion. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-28 Thread Nik.Th.
Unfortunately it does not work with 3.16.6 . I've tested with and without the nouveau.nofbaccel=1 parameter, but in both cases I had the same behavior as of 3.16.4 (Ubuntu 3.16.0-23-generic). I'm attaching the part of the log with the hibernation and resume messages. ** Attachment added:

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-28 Thread Nik.Th.
I really cannot spot any difference in logs, but maybe it's just me. Here is the log from the 3.17.1 kernel, where resume works as it should. ** Attachment added: 3.17.1-resume-succeeded.txt

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-28 Thread Christopher M. Penalver
Nik. Th. the next step is to fully reverse commit bisect the kernel in order to identify the fix commit. Could you please do this following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/KernelBisection#How_do_I_reverse_bisect_the_upstream_kernel.3F ? ** Tags removed: kernel-bug-fixed-upstream ** Tags added:

[Bug 1386695] Re: [3.16.0-23] Resume from suspend/hibernation, GPU lock - possible regression

2014-10-28 Thread Bug Watch Updater
Launchpad has imported 14 comments from the remote bug at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81136. If you reply to an imported comment from within Launchpad, your comment will be sent to the remote bug automatically. Read more about Launchpad's inter-bugtracker facilities at