[Bug 1429614] Re: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't conflict anymore with the official packages.

2015-05-28 Thread LocutusOfBorg
invalid, I don't care anymore ** Changed in: virtualbox (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: virtualbox-guest-additions-iso (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1429614] Re: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't conflict anymore with the official packages.

2015-04-03 Thread LocutusOfBorg
maybe we can just drop this... the conflict on the official packages is available, so users might just have tried the .run installer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429614 Title:

[Bug 1429614] Re: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't conflict anymore with the official packages.

2015-04-03 Thread Sebastien Bacher
what's the status on that? is there anything that should still be sponsored? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429614 Title: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't

[Bug 1429614] Re: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't conflict anymore with the official packages.

2015-03-20 Thread Graham Inggs
I don't know. I think more investigation is needed before an SRU though. Part of the SRU process is coming up with a reproducible test case and showing that the proposed patch indeed solves the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1429614] Re: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't conflict anymore with the official packages.

2015-03-20 Thread LocutusOfBorg
I see on my utopic the package seems to be conflicting correctly (I mean the official one). Trying to install the debian one forces the removal. Why the dpkg log shows it if it is installed without the deb file? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1386328

[Bug 1429614] Re: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't conflict anymore with the official packages.

2015-03-19 Thread Graham Inggs
The sync was done in LP: #1433678. I don't think this is worth an SRU, as noted in comment 9 of the aforementioned bug, upstream already have the following in their packaging: Conflicts: virtualbox, virtualbox-guest-additions-iso, virtualbox-ose Replaces: virtualbox Provides: virtualbox I don't

[Bug 1429614] Re: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't conflict anymore with the official packages.

2015-03-19 Thread LocutusOfBorg
so do you think all the bug reports are from the .run file installation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429614 Title: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't

[Bug 1429614] Re: [SRU] virtualbox and virtualbox-guest-additions-iso doesn't conflict anymore with the official packages.

2015-03-08 Thread LocutusOfBorg
Hi dear sponsors, the status is tracked in debian (I committed in the upstream git) and I would like to ask a sync for vivid, and SRU for all previous ubuntu releases. the potential impact is *nothing* but it will fix many bugs, e.g. (LP: #1371287, LP: #1375018, LP: #1385931, LP: #1386328, LP: