Finally, i've deleted pidgin from that bug report. After thinking, it appears that HTML and PDF docs are often used to show documentation, therefore apturl is important whith them whereas pidgin stand for something more instanteneous and apturl is probably useless with it
BTW, anything new concerning apturl in Evince ? ** Changed in: ubuntu Sourcepackagename: pidgin => None ** Summary changed: - apturl doesn't work with Evince in PDF files nor with Pidgin + apturl doesn't work with Evince in PDF files -- apturl doesn't work with Evince in PDF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144301 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
