This bug was fixed in the package nfs-utils - 1:1.2.8-9ubuntu12
---
nfs-utils (1:1.2.8-9ubuntu12) xenial; urgency=medium
* Drop gssproxy as it's not in Ubuntu (LP: #1446851)
* Fix no nfs doesn't show failed units on client (LP: #1452667)
-- Bryan Quigley Wed, 02 Mar 2016
15:01
@laurent-bonnaud
Did you file an RTP? I couldn't find one...
I'm coming at this from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-
utils/+bug/1452667
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446851
Title:
systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit gssproxy.service
To
>> Having an error message that is not really an error is confusing,
> Not everything in the logs is an error message. I think it's clear
from context that this is a warning, not an error.
Also, a warning is still warning you something is possibly wrong and to
fix it. If a user is reporting that
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446851
Title:
> Arch solved this problem by packaging gssproxy and making nfs-utils
depend on it. That's not a correct fix for a message about an *optional*
service that is absent from the system.
Agreed.
However, having gssproxy in Debian/Ubuntu would a good thing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Featu
Arch solved this problem by packaging gssproxy and making nfs-utils
depend on it. That's not a correct fix for a message about an
*optional* service that is absent from the system
> Having an error message that is not really an error is confusing,
Not everything in the logs is an error message.
> Do you see any indication that the system is behaving incorrectly,
aside from this message?
I cannot tell because GSS is used for NFS+Kerberos and I do not use
Kerberos on this server.
Having an error message that is not really an error is confusing, especially
for an admin who tried to debug
Hi Laurent,
It's valid for systemd units to declare ordering requirements with
respect to other optional units which may not be installed on the system
at the time. This appears to be one of these cases. Do you see any
indication that the system is behaving incorrectly, aside from this
message?
Note that this bug has been fixed in Arch Linux:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/42635
(launchpad did not recognize this URL as a foreign bug tracker)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
10 matches
Mail list logo
