[Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-13 Thread Rimas Kudelis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** I'm not offended, sorry for my tone. It's just that recieving long comments that make no use is sometimes annoying. Anyways, rkaliss, good luck with Ubuntu. Here's one lesson for you: always look at This report is a duplicate of bug #* header at

[Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-13 Thread Murray Cumming
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** rkallis, my comment was not directed at you. Thanks for the contribution. -- GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus https://launchpad.net/bugs/14669 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-13 Thread rkaliss
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** Thanks for your understanding and your tip is much appreciated. -ray On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 08:38 +, Rimas Kudelis wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** I'm not offended, sorry for my tone. It's just that recieving long

Re: [Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-13 Thread rkaliss
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** You *all* have my admiration and gratitude for what you do. -ray On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 09:03 +, Murray Cumming wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** rkallis, my comment was not directed at you. Thanks for the contribution.

[Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-12 Thread rebroad
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** How can we be sure it is a GTK issue please? Thanks. -- GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus https://launchpad.net/bugs/14669 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-12 Thread Laurent Bigonville
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** See upstream bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56070 -- GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus https://launchpad.net/bugs/14669 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-12 Thread rkaliss
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** It appears that someone gave this bug the header of ... GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus The window is still in focus and never left focus. It is the install window and there are no other windows involved, opened, or even

[Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-12 Thread Rimas Kudelis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** Jeez, Ray, don't you see this bug is marked as a dupe? Did you care to check the description for bug #22930? It says Mouse focus doesn't return until mouse is moved off button. Doesn't its description reflect the problem? -- GTK+ buttons not

[Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-12 Thread Murray Cumming
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** Please be nice. He was just trying to help, and launchpad is often far from easy to navigate. -- GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus https://launchpad.net/bugs/14669 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-12 Thread rkaliss
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** My apologies ... no, I am not familiar with the process. I am very new to Ubuntu and Linux in general. Please don't be offended. We were all 'newbies' at some point. It is my turn to be the newbie. I will make mistakes. -ray On Mon, 2007-03-12 at

Re: [Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-12 Thread rkaliss
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** Typing has no 'tone'. The interpretation of not-nice can be in the mind of the reader. My description was not intended to be anything other than nice - while trying to zero in on things (it seemed to me that the problems was being misunderstood). I