[Bug 147807] Re: vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192

2007-12-14 Thread Scott James Remnant
udev (117-1) hardy; urgency=low * New upstream release: - udev ancillary tools merged into a single udevadm binary. - dynamic rules may be created in /dev/.udev/rules.d - SYMLINK==value matches currently defined symlinks. - RUN{ignore_error} will ignore errors from programs.

[Bug 147807] Re: vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192

2007-10-17 Thread Scott James Remnant
The maximum default cluster size under Windows XP is 4 kilobytes (KB) because NTFS file compression is not possible on drives with a larger allocation size. The Format utility never uses clusters that are larger than 4 KB unless you specifically override that default either by using the /A:

[Bug 147807] Re: vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192

2007-10-17 Thread Kay Sievers
Sounds good, let's just add these values. -- vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 147807] Re: vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192

2007-10-17 Thread Kay Sievers
Comitted a fix to the udev git tree. I have no idea how a value of 256k fit into a 16bit value. :) -- vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the

[Bug 147807] Re: vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192

2007-10-16 Thread Kay Sievers
The FAT spec says: sector size must still be less than or equal to 4096. Which tool did you use to format the volume? -- vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 147807] Re: vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192

2007-10-16 Thread Phil Richards
Well, the point was that *I* didn't format it. It came out of the box (from Seagate) formatted that way. It's really a none issue for me now - I gave up and reformatted the disk with different filesystem types :-) (Something I would have done early, but moving 200 Gb of data around was slightly

[Bug 147807] Re: vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192

2007-10-15 Thread Scott James Remnant
Kay: yet another vol_id bug -- vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 147807] Re: vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192

2007-10-03 Thread Scott James Remnant
** Summary changed: - udev vol_id does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192 + vol_id: does not recognise FAT* partitions with sector size 8192 ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: udev - Since upgrading from Edgy Eft to Feisty Fawn I have been unable to automount