[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-10-19 Thread Pat McGowan
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489410 Title: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-31 Thread Martin Pitt
This fix will now get along with a completely empty /var/lib/apt/lists/. Note that the directory /var/lib/apt/lists/partial/ itself still needs to be present (otherwise apt/python-apt will try to re-create it), but it does not need to contain any files any more. This should address this immediate

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-31 Thread Martin Pitt
Committed to wily branch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core- dev/ubuntu/wily/apport/ubuntu/revision/2449 ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu/wily/apport/ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489410 Title: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed To manage notifications

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-31 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package apport - 2.18-0ubuntu9 --- apport (2.18-0ubuntu9) wily; urgency=medium * Revert changes to data/package_hook to include the package version. This just hides the problem that somewhere during whoopsie add_package_info() is not called. (See

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-28 Thread Oliver Grawert
note that we don't have /var/lib/dpkg on snappy either, it would be good to find a solution we can use on snappy personal and snappy phone in the future... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-28 Thread Steve Langasek
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489410 Title: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed To manage

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-27 Thread Ɓukasz Zemczak
** Tags added: lt-blocker lt-category-noimpact -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489410 Title: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-27 Thread Oliver Grawert
another option would be to simply make apport use the manifest files on cdimage or launchpad or provide another way of handling this data remotely ... after all whoopsie and apport rely on being able to send the reports to a server so a usable network connection exists at some point. this

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Ah, bug 1471903 has some more info, I updated the description. So it indeed is about the origin detection. ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New = Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1489410] Re: do not require apt lists to be pre-installed

2015-08-27 Thread Martin Pitt
Hey Pat! Can you please elaborate what the actual effect of this is? AFAIK apport needs the apt lists only to determine/validate the origin of a package (which we can/should work around on a system image indeed), but *not* to determine the Package:/Dependencies: fields. I. e. mapping files to