** Changed in: batik (Debian)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
** Changed in: batik (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
This bug was fixed in the package batik - 1.7.dfsg-0ubuntu1
---
batik (1.7.dfsg-0ubuntu1) intrepid; urgency=low
[ Onkar Shinde ]
* New upstream version (LP: #147818)
* debian/control
- Add Sun JDK 1.5 as build dependency. Fixes FTBFS on buildd. (LP: #150484)
Also add S
Are you sure about that? I verified the build with intrepid openjdk -
both JPEGTranscoder and TIFFTranscoder are present in
org/apache/batik/transcoder/image.
Maybe that functionality isn't present in Debian openjdk? (I haven't
looked at that one yet, it being recently added at all.)
And yes, my
@Matvey,
The way build.xml is written in batik 1.7, if the JDK is not from Sun,
then JPEG and TIFF transcoders are not built. So it is loss of
functionality.
I suggest we get the package build first and then I can investigate
build with GCJ/OpenJDK. I hope we will reach a conclusion on the curren
The current openjdk-6 in Ubuntu does contain the sun.* image APIs,
although javac warns that they are deprecated. Not sure about Debian.
I'm trying to test-build it with openjdk for intrepid right now.
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notifi
As for prebuilt jars, I know that freecol (which we sync from Debian)
removes them from the orig.tar.gz.
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
It builds successfully with openjdk-6-jdk in pbuilder. Since there are
disagreements, I won't sponsor it just yet - not until at least getting
input from slytherin.
As for openjdk-6 vs sun-java5, I think the possibility to get it into
universe (or main in Debian's case) outweighs the loss of compa
@Matvey,
Please note that there was a discussion in last few days on Debian java mailing
list about what is the right approach to get orig.tar.gz i.e. whether to strip
prebuild jar library files when packaging orig.tar.gz.
I was recommended to keep orig.tar.gz as close as possible to upstream an
excellent. Thank you for your work! I'm looking forward having a usable
'fop' package at last!
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
I'm into it.
Since the main goal is to fix an FTBFS, for now I'll submit the package
as is (built with Java 5), provided it actually builds. We can discuss
the Java 6 move issue later. Furthermore, if we do decide to use Java 6,
I imagine it should be openjdk rather than sun, so it can be moved to
Subscribed u-u-s since there is no response from Daniel for last 3-4
days.
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
FYI ... xml-commons-external has been cleared from NEW.
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://l
Daniel,
Since the javac tasks in build.xml files doesn't specify target VM, if
you use Java 6, the resulting binary will not be compatible with Java 5
VM. So I preferred the common denominator.
By the way, I forgot to mention. Upstream provides source in .zip
format. It needs to be repackaged as
Unsubscribed u-u-s, since I will handle sponsorship.
Subscribing Onkar: please see my previous comment, asking for information.
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
Is there a reason why you prefer Java 5 instead of 6 (in Build-Depends)?
Apart from that, /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-sun should get added to JAVA_HOME_DIRS, so
it builds with sun-java-6.
I will sponsor this (and can make the above mentioned adjustments myself), once
the dependency has been cleared from
Please find attached diff.gz for version 1.7. It builds with Sun JDK 1.5
so FTBFS should be fixed.
Please note that this version has build dependency on libxml-commons-
external-java (source xml-commons-external) which is currently in 'NEW'
queue.
** Attachment added: "batik_1.7-0ubuntu1.diff.gz"
Onkar, that's great!
I'm assigning the bug to you.
** Changed in: batik (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Daniel Hahler (blueyed) => Onkar Shinde (onkarshinde)
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
Daniel,
I didn't know anyone was working on batik 1.7. I am almost finished with
it except documenting all the changes in changelog. I have already
packaged it's dependency, xml-commons-external, and it is in 'NEW'
queue.
Do you mind if I take over the update?
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https:/
I'll look into it in the next days. At least I have the files still
around.
** Changed in: batik (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
daniel, could you please upload your 1.7 package to intrepid now?
** Changed in: batik (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Hahler (blueyed)
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
I had contacted the Debian maintainer (Vincent Fourmond) about this. His reply
is pasted below.
I think we'll have to look into this again ourselves, since it does not appear
that we can sync from Debian.
This needs to follow
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess#head-1d28045481b8803d48
I think the best course of action is to upload it right now, then file a
bug asking the archive admins to move it to universe (since it no longer
depends on the proprietary Java).
I'm really looking forward to the new version, as it will unbreak FOP
builds.
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bug
** Changed in: batik (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: batik (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Daniel Hahler (blueyed) => (unassigned)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
** Changed in: batik (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #397562
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=39756
Debian's "new upstream" release bug [1] is blocked by another ITP bug and it's
not yet clear how they will address the sun-jdk1.4 issue.
I've grabbed the latest upstream release (1.7), changed the build-dependencies
to icedtea-java7-jdk and did some other tweaks and it builds fine.
Should I uplo
There is a new version on debian.. 1.6-4, but it needs sun-j2sdk1.4
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
** Changed in: batik (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
Assignee: Onkar Shinde (onkarshinde) => Daniel Hahler (blueyed)
Status: New => In Progress
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Tags added: ftbfs
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
** Changed in: batik (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Onkar Shinde (onkarshinde)
--
batik has FTFBS forever
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/150484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
** Summary changed:
- missing binary packages for batik
+ batik has FTFBS forever
** Description changed:
- Please add a binary package for batik.
+ batik has FTBFS since Ubuntu began, due to depending on some Java that
+ requires EULA-agreement, IIRC. This probably wants to be worked around
+ s
31 matches
Mail list logo
