[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-19 Thread Steve Langasek
fwupdate-signed promoted to main. ** Changed in: fwupdate-signed (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title: [MIR] fwupdate T

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-15 Thread Steve Langasek
Override component to main fwupdate 0.5-2 in xenial: universe/misc -> main fwupdate 0.5-2 in xenial amd64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main fwupdate 0.5-2 in xenial arm64: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main fwupdate 0.5-2 in xenial armhf: universe/admin/optional/100% -> main fwupdate 0.5-2 in

Re: [Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-11 Thread Mario Limonciello
Ah OK, thanks that makes sense. On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:40 PM Michael Terry wrote: > Yeah, it doesn't get pulled into main until something in main depends on > it. So in this case, we're probably waiting for fwupd's MIR (bug > 1536871). And then for gnome-software to depend on fwupd and pull

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-11 Thread Michael Terry
Yeah, it doesn't get pulled into main until something in main depends on it. So in this case, we're probably waiting for fwupd's MIR (bug 1536871). And then for gnome-software to depend on fwupd and pull it all in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-10 Thread Mario Limonciello
@mterry, I noticed this is still actually in universe. Is there something else that needs to be done for it to finish the move to main? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title:

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-04 Thread Mario Limonciello
Yeah it looks like it was the -signed package. That upload caused the proposed migration to happen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title: [MIR] fwupdate To manage notificati

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-04 Thread Mario Limonciello
Once the MIR for fwupd (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fwupd/+bug/1536871) is done I'm expecting that firmware support will be turned on in gnome-software (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1544376). In my mind either gnome-software should recommend the sign

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-04 Thread Michael Terry
Looked at the -signed version too, it's fine. What pulls the -signed version in? Does it need to be seeded or does something depend on it? ** Also affects: fwupdate-signed (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: fwupdate-signed (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Comm

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-04 Thread Mario Limonciello
I think it might be be because 0.5-2 synced from Debian and fwupdate- signed needed to be redone. I just bumped fwupdate-signed version to 1.4 to see if that does the trick on migration. Does fwupdate-signed need an MIR too? Or since it's built from fwupdate and just signing the binary it's impl

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-04 Thread Michael Terry
What's stopping fwupdate from migrating from proposed? update_excuses has it as a valid candidate. Further fixes are great, but not blockers for promotion. With Seth's ACK and a look myself at the packaging, fwupdate seems fine to me. ** Changed in: fwupdate (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-04 Thread Mario Limonciello
Thanks Seth. I've submitted upstream a fix for get_fd_and_media_path and the various shellcheck fixes. I expect they should be merged for the next fwupdate release. https://github.com/rhinstaller/fwupdate/pull/45/commits I'm unsure if fflush(fout) is needed between fputc() and fclose(). I think

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-03 Thread Seth Arnold
I reviewed fwupdate version 0.5-1 as checked into xenial. This should not be considered a full security audit but rather a quick gauge of maintainability. - fwupdate helps Linux hosts install and run UEFI-based updates - Build-Depends: debhelper, pkg-config, libpopt-dev, libefivar-dev, lsb-relea

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-03 Thread Tyler Hicks
** Changed in: fwupdate (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title: [MIR] fwupdate To manage notifications about this bug go to: h

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-03-02 Thread Mario Limonciello
Just wanted to check in on this security review for MIR. Seth is this still in your queue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title: [MIR] fwupdate To manage notifications about

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-01-26 Thread Robert Ancell
** Tags added: gnome-software-ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title: [MIR] fwupdate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-01-26 Thread Robert Ancell
Required for fwupd MIR (bug 1536871) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title: [MIR] fwupdate To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-01-12 Thread Michael Terry
Back to Seth I guess! ** Changed in: fwupdate (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title: [MIR] fwupdate To manag

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2016-01-12 Thread Jackson Doak
The 0.5 release is in ubuntu now, fixing the majority of the issues above -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1508926 Title: [MIR] fwupdate To manage notifications about this bug go to: h

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2015-11-17 Thread Mario Limonciello
It's worth mentioning that upstream saw this and has corrected many things upstream: https://github.com/rhinstaller/fwupdate/issues/32#event-467050566 Also, it's available in debian-next w/ packaging here: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/uefi/fwupdate.git/log/?h=debian-next That will be released

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2015-11-04 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
** Description changed: [Availability] fwupdate is available in universe and builds on all the architectures it is designed to work on (amd64, i386, armhf, arm64) [Rationale] fwupdate is a new EFI component for processing firmware updates for systems which support it. It will be used

[Bug 1508926] Re: [MIR] fwupdate

2015-10-22 Thread Seth Arnold
My review from mid-september. I'd also like to suggest using Coverity on this codebase. The 'delete_variable()' portion was handled upstream already: https://github.com/rhinstaller/fwupdate/commit/8139030084c51418778815ed283237553b1cec47 I also understand that Microsoft is the correct signing en